★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 11425 ⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight Constitutional Neutral (+0.02) 📜 Art. II §2: Commander-in-Chief Supervisory Authority

Executive Order 11425—Study of United States Foreign Trade Policy

•
Friday, August 30, 1968
•
3 min read (649 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 3 min read (649 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

In conducting the study and in preparing his final recommendations to the President, the Special Representative for Trade Negotiations (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Representative") shall consider the views and recommendations of Members of the Congress, of the Public Advisory Committee on Trade Policy, and of other interested agencies of the United States Government concerning the future nature and direction of United States foreign trade policy.

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight
Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
📜 Art. II §2: Commander-in-Chief Supervisory Authority
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Armed Forces & Military Establishments Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises Sovereign State Governments & Localities Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson on August 30, 1968, this order concerns Study of United States Foreign Trade Policy. Preparation of study. (a) In conducting the study and in preparing his final recommendations to the President, the Special Representative for Trade Negotiations (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Representative") shall consider the views and recommendations of Members of the Congress, of the Public Advisory Committee on Trade Policy, and of other interested agencies of the United States Government concerning…

Constitutional Assessment: Scrutinized through Article II, Section 2, this action exercises the President's constitutional role as Commander in Chief. Early Framers recognized broad executive discretion in commanding military forces during conflict, provided it remains bounded by congressional declarations and respects civilian domestic courts.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

In conducting the study and in preparing his final recommendations to the President, the Special Representative for Trade Negotiations (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Representative") shall consider the views and recommendations of Members of the Congress, of the Public Advisory Committee on Trade Policy, and of other interested agencies of the United States Government concerning the future nature and direction of United States foreign trade policy.

▪

The Special Representative shall determine the most effective ways and means of obtaining such views and recommendations in order to render them as useful to the study as possible.

▪

For purposes of the study, the Special Representative shall review and consider the hearings on foreign trade held by various committees of the House of Representatives and the Senate during the 90th Congress, and shall seek the views and recommendations of the members of the committees of the House of Representatives and the Senate concerned with trade policy.

▪

For purposes of the study, there is hereby established a committee to be known as the Public Advisory Committee on Trade Policy, which shall furnish its views and recommendations to the Special Representative.

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Armed Forces & Military Establishments 🏛️ Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises 🏛️ Sovereign State Governments & Localities 🏛️ Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants 🏛️ Private Citizens & Property Owners

Policy Areas & Topics

🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight)
§

"When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"Power is of an encroaching nature, and it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." — Federalist No. 48 (1788)

Madison would view this order with watchful scrutiny. Operating in the 'Zone of Twilight' where Congress is silent, each such directive establishes an administrative precedent that steadily expands the executive perimeter at the expense of legislative primacy.

Madisonian Stance: Vigilant / Cautionary
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"The direction of war implies the direction of the common strength; and the power of directing and employing the common strength must be under the direction of the single hand of the Executive." — Federalist No. 74 (1788)

Hamilton would forcefully champion executive discretion here. For foreign entanglements, commerce defense, and national security, deliberative assemblies are too slow and faction-ridden. A unified, energetic Executive exercising swift command is precisely what the Philadelphia Convention intended for national preservation.

Hamiltonian Stance: Strong Prerogative Support
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)

The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.

Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

⚖️ Discretionary Twilight Zone
50 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

High Friction

Touches upon core congressional prerogatives: raises appropriations reallocation, tariff imposition, or statutory preemption questions.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Low Friction

Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

Moderate Friction

Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Moderate Friction

Applies regulatory or compliance standards to private contractors or commercial entities.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Moderate Friction

The order relies on inherent Article II executive discretion, civil service management, or foreign diplomacy where Congress has neither expressly approved nor prohibited action.

Benchmark: Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
649
4,078 characters
Estimated Read Time
3 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
15.9
College Level
Language Tone Score
+0.02
Constitutional Neutral
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

WHEREAS I have directed the Special Representative for Trade Negotiations to conduct a long-range study of United States foreign trade policy (hereinafter referred to as "the study") and to recommend to me such legislative and other measures as may be required; WHEREAS the policies undertaken as a result of the study will have a significant impact upon the economy as well as upon the international relations of the United States; and WHEREAS the study will benefit from the views and recommendations of Members of the Congress, representatives of various sectors of the economy of the United States, and other interested agencies of the United States Government: Now, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United States, it is ordered as follows: SECTION 1. Preparation of study. (a) In conducting the study and in preparing his final recommendations to the President, the Special Representative for Trade Negotiations (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Representative") shall consider the views and recommendations of Members of the Congress, of the Public Advisory Committee on Trade Policy, and of other interested agencies of the United States Government concerning the future nature and direction of United States foreign trade policy. (b) The Special Representative shall determine the most effective ways and means of obtaining such views and recommendations in order to render them as useful to the study as possible. SEC. 2. Views of Members of Congress. For purposes of the study, the Special Representative shall review and consider the hearings on foreign trade held by various committees of the House of Representatives and the Senate during the 90th Congress, and shall seek the views and recommendations of the members of the committees of the House of Representatives and the Senate concerned with trade policy. SEC. 3. Public Advisory Committee on Trade Policy. (a) For purposes of the study, there is hereby established a committee to be known as the Public Advisory Committee on Trade Policy, which shall furnish its views and recommendations to the Special Representative. (b) The Committee shall be composed of not more than 35 members who shall be designated by the President from among, appropriately qualified citizens of the United States outside the United States Government, who shall be representative of various sectors of the economy of the United States, and who shall serve without compensation from the United States Government. (c) The Committee shall meet upon the request of the Special Representative. SEC. 4. Participation by other agencies. (a) For purposes of the study, the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Interior, Labor, State, and Treasury, and such other agencies as the Special Representative may from time to time call upon, shall furnish views and recommendations to him. (b) In addition, the agencies referred to in subsection (a.) shall, at the request of the Special Representative, assist him in the preparation of the study by all appropriate means. SEC. 5. Applicability of Executive Order No. 11007. (a) The provisions of sections 4, 6(a), 6 (b), 6(c), and 6(f) of Executive Order No. 11007 of February 26, 1962, which prescribes regulations for the formation and use of advisory committees, are hereby adapted and made applicable to the Public Advisory Committee on Trade Policy established by section 3 of this Order. (b) The Special Representative shall be responsible for assuring compliance with the provisions of Executive Order No. 11007 referred to in subsection (a) in relation to that Committee, and he is authorized to exercise the authority contained in section 6 (f) of that Order and to prescribe such additional regulations with respect to that Committee as he may deem necessary. SEC. 6. Prior body and orders. The Public Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations is hereby abolished, and Executive Order No. 11143 of March 2, 1964, and Executive Order No. 11159 of June 23, 1964, are hereby revoked. LYNDON B. JOHNSON The White House August 30, 1968

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 11,425 (Aug. 30, 1968), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-11425-study-united-states-foreign-trade-policy.