Clause (a) section 1, Civil Service Rule IX, Reinstatement, is amended to read as follows: (a) Unless otherwise provided hereinafter a person may be reinstated only to the department or independent Government establishment from which separated and upon requisition made within one year from the date of his separation. In its discretion the Commission may after absolute appointment allow reinstatement in any part of the classified service, and it may also authorize waiver of the one-year limit herein prescribed, under the following time limitations: two years where service has been two years but less than three years; three years where service has been three years but less than four years; four years where service has been four years but less than five years; and without time limit where service has been five years or more; Provided, that the applicant for reinstatement who has been separated more than five years is otherwise eligible as set forth under the conditions of the Executive Order of June 2, 1920; and Provided , further, that he can qualify under an appropriate noncompetitive examination. HERBERT HOOVER The White House, July 9, 1929.
Executive Order 5153 ⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight Constitutional Neutral (+0.02)
📜 Art. II §3: Administrative Management & Civil Service
Executive Order 5153—Amendment of Civil Service Rule IX Pertaining to Reinstatement
Executive Brief • At a Glance
⏱️ 1 min read (187 words) •
● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate
Clause (a) section 1, Civil Service Rule IX, Reinstatement, is amended to read as follows: (a) Unless otherwise provided hereinafter a person may be reinstated only to the department or independent Government establishment from which separated and upon requisition made within one year from the date of his separation.
⚖️ Constitutional Footing
⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight
Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
📜 Art. II §3: Administrative Management & Civil Service
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants
Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis
Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.
Signed by President Herbert Hoover on July 9, 1929, this order concerns Amendment of Civil Service Rule IX Pertaining to Reinstatement. Clause (a) section 1, Civil Service Rule IX, Reinstatement, is amended to read as follows: (a) Unless otherwise provided hereinafter a person may be reinstated only to the department or independent Government establishment from which separated and upon requisition made within one year from the date of his separation.
Constitutional Assessment: This action represents an orderly exercise of Article II administrative discretion, managing the internal machinery and personnel of the executive branch without abridging the ancient liberties of the people.
Key Directives & Operative Actions
▪
Clause (a) section 1, Civil Service Rule IX, Reinstatement, is amended to read as follows: (a) Unless otherwise provided hereinafter a person may be reinstated only to the department or independent Government establishment from which separated and upon requisition made within one year from the date of his separation.
▪
In its discretion the Commission may after absolute appointment allow reinstatement in any part of the classified service, and it may also authorize waiver of the one-year limit herein prescribed, under the following time limitations: two years where service has been two years but less than three years; three years where service has been three years but less than four years; four years where service has been four years but less than five years; and without time limit where service has been five years or more; Provided, that the applicant for reinstatement who has been separated more than five years is otherwise eligible as set forth under the conditions of the Executive Order of June 2, 1920; and Provided , further, that he can qualify…
Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted
🏛️ Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants
Policy Areas & Topics
🏛️
The Framers' Constitutional Council
1787 PrismEvaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.
⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight)
§
"When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority."
— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
JM
James Madison
Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy
"Power is of an encroaching nature, and it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." — Federalist No. 48 (1788)
Madison would view this order with watchful scrutiny. Operating in the 'Zone of Twilight' where Congress is silent, each such directive establishes an administrative precedent that steadily expands the executive perimeter at the expense of legislative primacy.
Madisonian Stance: Vigilant / Cautionary
AH
Alexander Hamilton
The Energetic Executive & Unified Command
"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)
Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.
Hamiltonian Stance: Defends Vigor & Dispatch
GM
George Mason
Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment
"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)
The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.
Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐
Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions
An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.
⚖️ Discretionary Twilight Zone
52 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8
High Friction
Legislative Encroachment & Purse
Touches upon core congressional prerogatives: raises appropriations reallocation, tariff imposition, or statutory preemption questions.
Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3
Moderate Friction
Executive Scope & Faithfulness
Directs internal executive branch machinery, agency workflows, and federal personnel.
Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment
Moderate Friction
Federalism & State Sovereignty
Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.
Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments
Low Friction
Due Process & Individual Rights
Focuses on internal governmental operations with no direct impairment of private rights or property.
Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers
Moderate Friction
Youngstown Jacksonian Tier
The order relies on inherent Article II executive discretion, civil service management, or foreign diplomacy where Congress has neither expressly approved nor prohibited action.
Benchmark: Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
⚖️
Audit Synthesis
This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.
Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
187
1,159 characters
Estimated Read Time
1 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
28
Post-Graduate Legal
Text size:
Related Executive Orders
Other executive actions signed by Herbert Hoover around this period.
EO 5154 Jul 9, 1929
🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5154—Authorizing the Reinstatement of Birdie E. Gordon Without Regard to Civil Service Rules
📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution
Mrs. Birdie E. Gordon may be reinstated as an operative in the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, without regard to the length of time she has been separated from the service.
Herbert Hoover College Level • 1m
EO 5152 Jul 8, 1929
🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5152—Authorizing the Reinstatement of Lulu M. Davis Without Regard to Civil Service Rules
📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution
Mrs. Lulu M. Davis may be reinstated as an operative in the Bureau of Engraving and Printing without regard to the length of time she has been separated from the service.
Herbert Hoover High School • 1m
EO 5151 Jul 8, 1929
⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5151-A—Assignment of Frequencies to Government Radio Stations
📜 Art. II §2: Commander-in-Chief Supervisory Authority
I, Herbert Hoover, President of the United States, pursuant to the authority vested in me by law, do hereby amend Executive Order No. 4846-A, dated March 30, 1928, to include the following assignments to the War Department and to the Navy Department as follows: FREQUENCY…
Herbert Hoover Post-Graduate Legal • 3m
EO 5155 Jul 11, 1929
⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5155—Restoring a Portion of Fort DeRussy Military Reservation, Hawaii, for Widening Ena Road
📜 Art. II §2: Commander-in-Chief Supervisory Authority
The following portion of the Fort De Russy Military Reservation, situated at Honolulu, Island of Oahu, Territory of Hawaii, set apart by Executive Order (No. 2978) of October 21, 1918, is hereby withdrawn from the operation of said Executive order, and the same is hereby set…
Herbert Hoover High School • 1m
EO 5156 Jul 13, 1929
⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5156—Designating Harvey M. Hutchison as Acting Judge of the District Court of the United States for Porto Rico
📜 5th Amend: Regulatory Execution with Due Process
I hereby designate the Honorable Harvey M. Hutchison, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico, as acting Judge of the District Court of the United States for Porto Rico for the months of September and October, 1929, during the absence on vacation of Honorable Ira…
Herbert Hoover High School • 1m
EO 5150 Jul 5, 1929
🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5150—Authorizing the Reinstatement of Mae A. Krigbaum Without Regard to Civil Service Rules
📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution
Mrs. Mae A. Krigbaum may be reinstated as an operative in the Bureau of Engraving and Printing without regard to the length of her separation from the service. She was appointed and served thru competitive examination as printer's assistant, from June, 1902, to February, 1905.
Herbert Hoover High School • 1m
📜
Scholarly & Legal Citations
Exec. Order No. 5153 (July 9, 1929), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-5153-amendment-civil-service-rule-ix-pertaining-reinstatement.
