Whereas section 4 of the act of Congress entitled "An act to amend section 13 of the act of March 4, 1923, entitled 'An act to provide for the classification of civilian positions within the District of Columbia and in the field services,' as amended by the act of May 28, 1928," approved July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 1003-1005), provides: The Personnel Classification Board shall have authority to ascertain currently opinion, the facts warrant: Provided , That such review and change shall be made only after consultation with the heads of the departments concerned and after affording all incumbents of positions affected an opportunity to be heard, of which hearing a permanent written record shall be made and kept, including all testimony taken: Provided further , That in all cases where the board shall change the allocation of a position to a lower grade the rate of pay fixed for such position prior to such change may be continued so long as the position is held by the incumbent then occupying it. Now, Therefore , whenever, in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing law, the Personnel Classification Board on its own initiative shall review and change the existing allocation of a position, such change is approved to take effect 30 days from the date when the notice of the change is received by the department concerned unless the head of the department shall file with the Personnel Classification Board within that period, a protest against the change. If a protest is filed by the head of a department, the Personnel Classification Board shall promptly transmit such protest to the President, with a statement of its reasons for the change of allocation, and such protested change shall not become effective unless and until approved by the President. HERBERT HOOVER The White House, October 30, 1930.
Executive Order 5473—Procedure Pertaining to Changes by the Personnel Classification Board in Existing Allocations of Positions
Executive Brief • At a Glance
Whenever, in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing law, the Personnel Classification Board on its own initiative shall review and change the existing allocation of a position, such change is approved to take effect 30 days from the date when the notice of the change is received by the department concerned unless the head of the department shall file with the Personnel Classification Board within that period, a protest against the change.
Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis
Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.
Signed by President Herbert Hoover on October 30, 1930, this order concerns Procedure Pertaining to Changes by the Personnel Classification Board in Existing Allocations of Positions. Whenever, in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing law, the Personnel Classification Board on its own initiative shall review and change the existing allocation of a position, such change is approved to take effect 30 days from the date when the notice of the change is received by the department concerned unless the head of the department shall file with the Personnel Classification Board within that…
Key Directives & Operative Actions
Whenever, in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing law, the Personnel Classification Board on its own initiative shall review and change the existing allocation of a position, such change is approved to take effect 30 days from the date when the notice of the change is received by the department concerned unless the head of the department shall file with the Personnel Classification Board within that period, a protest against the change.
If a protest is filed by the head of a department, the Personnel Classification Board shall promptly transmit such protest to the President, with a statement of its reasons for the change of allocation, and such protested change shall not become effective unless and until approved by the President.
Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted
Policy Areas & Topics
The Framers' Constitutional Council
1787 PrismEvaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.
"When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority."
James Madison
Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy
"Power is of an encroaching nature, and it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." — Federalist No. 48 (1788)
Madison would view this order with watchful scrutiny. Operating in the 'Zone of Twilight' where Congress is silent, each such directive establishes an administrative precedent that steadily expands the executive perimeter at the expense of legislative primacy.
Alexander Hamilton
The Energetic Executive & Unified Command
"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)
Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.
George Mason
Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment
"The purse and the sword ought never to be in the same hands... nor the liberties of the citizen placed at the pleasure of a single magistrate." — Virginia Ratifying Convention (1788)
George Mason and the Anti-Federalists would sound a fierce warning. They feared that Article II would inevitably evolve into an elective monarchy. When an executive order impacts private rights, property, or civil liberties without individualized judicial process, Mason would see their darkest predictions verified.
Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions
An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.
Legislative Encroachment & Purse
Operates within delegated statutory execution without modifying legislative appropriations or taxing powers.
Executive Scope & Faithfulness
Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.
Federalism & State Sovereignty
Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.
Due Process & Individual Rights
Focuses on internal governmental operations with no direct impairment of private rights or property.
Youngstown Jacksonian Tier
The order relies on inherent Article II executive discretion, civil service management, or foreign diplomacy where Congress has neither expressly approved nor prohibited action.
This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.
Scholarly & Legal Citations
Exec. Order No. 5473 (Oct. 30, 1930), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-5473-procedure-pertaining-changes-the-personnel-classification-board.