An application having been made by the Men's Clothing Code Authority pursuant to and in full compliance with the provisions of Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, and pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII of the Code, for amendment of the Code of Fair Competition for the Men's Clothing Industry as heretofore approved by me on August 26, 1933, and for the modification of my approval of said Code of Fair Competition accordingly, and the Administrator having recommended the granting of such approval, such proposed amendments to be in accordance with the following proposals: A. That there be added to Article III of the Code, a new paragraph as follows: "For a period of three (3) months after December 11, 1933, any employer affected by Article III of the Code may engage learners to supplant home-workers, who shall be paid not less than seventy percent (70%) of the minimum wage provided in the Code; provided, that no employee shall be classified as a learner for longer than the first eight (8) weeks of his employment in the industry, and, provided, further, that if any learner working on a piece work operation, earns more, he shall receive what he earns." B. That the following be added to Article IV of said Code: "Employers shall post such portions of this Code and in such manner as may be prescribed by the Code Authority." C. That there be added to the second paragraph of Article X of said Code the following: "Top coats, spring season--------------------------April 15 Top coats, fall season-----------------------------November 15 Top coats are defined to be garments made of fabrics of twenty-two (22) oz. or less in weight per yard of fifty-six (56) inches in width." D. That there he added to Article II of said Code a new paragraph (g) as follows: "Persons whose earning capacity is limited because of physical or mental handicap, may be employed at a wage below the minimum established by this Code, provided, (1) That they shall be paid proportionately no less than the other employees receive for similar work, but in no case shall their compensation amount to less than seventy percent (70%) of the amount required by the Minimum Wage Provision of this Code. (2) That the proportion of such excepted persons to the total number of employees in any plant shall not at any time exceed five percent (5%). (3) The Code Authority shall have the right to investigate and disallow any claims for exemption. The decision of the Code Authority shall be final and the employer shall comply therewith, unless and until the Administrator shall upon appeal by an employer or employee, disapprove the decision of the Code Authority. (4) That where it has been the custom of an employer to maintain a proportion of such employees in excess of five percent (5%) of the total number of employees in his plant, the Code Authority may, upon application and proof, allow the employer to employ more than five percent (5%) of excepted persons, subject to these provisions. (5) That on or before the tenth (10th) day of each month, the employer shall prepare and transmit to the Code Authority a list for the preceding month of such excepted persons, stating names, class of occupation, wage rating, length of service, and reasons for exception. (6) These exceptions shall not be used by employers as a device to evade the provisions of this Code. (7) The Code Authority shall report to the Administrator within three (3) months, and from time to time thereafter, as to the effect of these provisions, both generally and in cases of individual hardship, so that the Administrator may determine, in his discretion, whether or not the provisions of this amendment shall be continued or changed." Now, Therefore , I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States, pursuant to the authority vested in me by Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, and otherwise, do approve the granting of the aforesaid applications, and do order that the final approval of the Code of Fair Competition for the Men's Clothing Industry contained in my Executive Order, dated August 26, 1933, be and it is hereby modified to the foregoing effect. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT Approval recommended: Hugh S. Johnson. The White House, December 15, 1933.
Executive Order 6510—Men's Clothing Industry
Executive Brief • At a Glance
I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States, pursuant to the authority vested in me by Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, and otherwise, do approve the granting of the aforesaid applications, and do order that the final approval of the Code of Fair Competition for the Men's Clothing Industry contained in my Executive Order, dated August 26, 1933, be and it is hereby modified to the foregoing effect.
Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis
Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.
Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on December 15, 1933, this order concerns Men's Clothing Industry. I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States, pursuant to the authority vested in me by Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, and otherwise, do approve the granting of the aforesaid applications, and do order that the final approval of the Code of Fair Competition for the Men's Clothing Industry contained in my Executive Order, dated August 26, 1933, be and it is…
Key Directives & Operative Actions
I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States, pursuant to the authority vested in me by Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, and otherwise, do approve the granting of the aforesaid applications, and do order that the final approval of the Code of Fair Competition for the Men's Clothing Industry contained in my Executive Order, dated August 26, 1933, be and it is hereby modified to the foregoing effect.
Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted
Policy Areas & Topics
The Framers' Constitutional Council
1787 PrismEvaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.
"When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority."
James Madison
Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy
"Power is of an encroaching nature, and it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." — Federalist No. 48 (1788)
Madison would view this order with watchful scrutiny. Operating in the 'Zone of Twilight' where Congress is silent, each such directive establishes an administrative precedent that steadily expands the executive perimeter at the expense of legislative primacy.
Alexander Hamilton
The Energetic Executive & Unified Command
"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)
Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.
George Mason
Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment
"The purse and the sword ought never to be in the same hands... nor the liberties of the citizen placed at the pleasure of a single magistrate." — Virginia Ratifying Convention (1788)
George Mason and the Anti-Federalists would sound a fierce warning. They feared that Article II would inevitably evolve into an elective monarchy. When an executive order impacts private rights, property, or civil liberties without individualized judicial process, Mason would see their darkest predictions verified.
Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions
An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.
Legislative Encroachment & Purse
Administers commerce or fiscal programs requiring ongoing statutory delegation and legislative oversight.
Executive Scope & Faithfulness
Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.
Federalism & State Sovereignty
Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.
Due Process & Individual Rights
Applies regulatory or compliance standards to private contractors or commercial entities.
Youngstown Jacksonian Tier
The order relies on inherent Article II executive discretion, civil service management, or foreign diplomacy where Congress has neither expressly approved nor prohibited action.
This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.
Scholarly & Legal Citations
Exec. Order No. 6510 (Dec. 15, 1933), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-6510-mens-clothing-industry.