In order to effectuate the policy of title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States, pursuant to the authority thereby vested in me and in accordance with the provisions of said act and the provisions of an act to create a Federal Trade Commission, approved September 26, 1914, do hereby direct that: 1. Whenever any complainant shall be dissatisfied with the disposition by any Federal agency, except the Department of Justice, of any complaint charging that any person, partnership, corporation, or other association, or form of enterprise, is engaged in any monopolistic practice, or practice permitting or promoting a monopoly, or tending to eliminate, oppress, or discriminate against small enterprises, which is allegedly in violation of the provisions of any code of fair competition approved under the National Industrial Recovery Act, or allegedly sanctioned by the provisions of such code but allegedly in violation of section 3 (a) of said National Industrial Recovery Act, such complaint shall be transferred to the Federal Trade Commission by such agency upon request of the complainant. 2. The Federal Trade Commission may, in accordance with the provisions of the National Industrial Recovery Act and the provisions of an act to create a Federal Trade Commission, approved September 26, 1914, upon the receipt of any such complaint transmitted to it, institute a proceeding against such persons, partnerships, corporations, or other associations or form of enterprise as it may have reason to believe are engaged in the practices aforesaid, whenever it shall appear to the Federal Trade Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the interest of the public: Provided , That, if in any case the Federal Trade Commission shall determine that any such practice is not contrary to the provisions of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act or of sections 2, 3, or 7 of the act of October 15, 1914, commonly called the Clayton Act, it shall instead of instituting such proceeding, transfer the complaint, with the evidence and other information pertaining to the matter, to the Department of Justice. 3. The power herein conferred upon the Federal Trade Commission shall not be construed as being in derogation of any of the powers of said Commission under existing law. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT The White House, January 20, 1934.
Executive Order 6569—Complaints Charging the Pursuit of Monopolistic Practices
Executive Brief • At a Glance
In order to effectuate the policy of title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States, pursuant to the authority thereby vested in me and in accordance with the provisions of said act and the provisions of an act to create a Federal Trade Commission, approved September 26, 1914, do hereby direct that: 1.
Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis
Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.
Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on January 20, 1934, this order concerns Complaints Charging the Pursuit of Monopolistic Practices. In order to effectuate the policy of title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States, pursuant to the authority thereby vested in me and in accordance with the provisions of said act and the provisions of an act to create a Federal Trade Commission, approved September 26, 1914, do hereby direct that: 1.
Key Directives & Operative Actions
In order to effectuate the policy of title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States, pursuant to the authority thereby vested in me and in accordance with the provisions of said act and the provisions of an act to create a Federal Trade Commission, approved September 26, 1914, do hereby direct that: 1.
Whenever any complainant shall be dissatisfied with the disposition by any Federal agency, except the Department of Justice, of any complaint charging that any person, partnership, corporation, or other association, or form of enterprise, is engaged in any monopolistic practice, or practice permitting or promoting a monopoly, or tending to eliminate, oppress, or discriminate against small enterprises, which is allegedly in violation of the provisions of any code of fair competition approved under the National Industrial Recovery Act, or allegedly sanctioned by the provisions of such code but allegedly in violation of section 3 (a) of said National Industrial Recovery Act, such complaint shall be transferred to the Federal Trade Commission…
The Federal Trade Commission may, in accordance with the provisions of the National Industrial Recovery Act and the provisions of an act to create a Federal Trade Commission, approved September 26, 1914, upon the receipt of any such complaint transmitted to it, institute a proceeding against such persons, partnerships, corporations, or other associations or form of enterprise as it may have reason to believe are engaged in the practices aforesaid, whenever it shall appear to the Federal Trade Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the interest of the public: Provided , That, if in any case the Federal Trade Commission shall determine that any such practice is not contrary to the provisions of section 5 of the…
The power herein conferred upon the Federal Trade Commission shall not be construed as being in derogation of any of the powers of said Commission under existing law.
Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted
Policy Areas & Topics
The Framers' Constitutional Council
1787 PrismEvaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.
"When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority."
James Madison
Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy
"Power is of an encroaching nature, and it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." — Federalist No. 48 (1788)
Madison would view this order with watchful scrutiny. Operating in the 'Zone of Twilight' where Congress is silent, each such directive establishes an administrative precedent that steadily expands the executive perimeter at the expense of legislative primacy.
Alexander Hamilton
The Energetic Executive & Unified Command
"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)
Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.
George Mason
Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment
"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)
The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.
Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions
An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.
Legislative Encroachment & Purse
Operates within delegated statutory execution without modifying legislative appropriations or taxing powers.
Executive Scope & Faithfulness
Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.
Federalism & State Sovereignty
Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.
Due Process & Individual Rights
Applies regulatory or compliance standards to private contractors or commercial entities.
Youngstown Jacksonian Tier
The order relies on inherent Article II executive discretion, civil service management, or foreign diplomacy where Congress has neither expressly approved nor prohibited action.
This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.
Scholarly & Legal Citations
Exec. Order No. 6569 (Jan. 20, 1934), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-6569-complaints-charging-the-pursuit-monopolistic-practices.