★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 6730 ⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight Constitutional Neutral (+0.02) 📜 Art. II §1: Executive Discretion & Internal Operations

Executive Order 6730—Revised Code of Fair Competition of the Iron and Steel Industry

•
Wednesday, May 30, 1934
•
3 min read (525 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 3 min read (525 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

Said amendments to said Code be, and they hereby are, approved and that said Code as amended by said amendments, a copy of which is hereto attached as Exhibit B, be and it hereby is approved, said revised Code incorporating said amendments to become effective on June 11, 1934, prior to which effective date the Code of Fair Competition approved August 19, 1933, shall continue in full force and effect.

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight
Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
📜 Art. II §1: Executive Discretion & Internal Operations
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on May 30, 1934, this order concerns Revised Code of Fair Competition of the Iron and Steel Industry. Said amendments to said Code be, and they hereby are, approved and that said Code as amended by said amendments, a copy of which is hereto attached as Exhibit B, be and it hereby is approved, said revised Code incorporating said amendments to become effective on June 11, 1934, prior to which effective date the Code of Fair Competition approved August 19, 1933, shall continue in full force and effect.

Constitutional Assessment: This action represents an orderly exercise of Article II administrative discretion, managing the internal machinery and personnel of the executive branch without abridging the ancient liberties of the people.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

Said amendments to said Code be, and they hereby are, approved and that said Code as amended by said amendments, a copy of which is hereto attached as Exhibit B, be and it hereby is approved, said revised Code incorporating said amendments to become effective on June 11, 1934, prior to which effective date the Code of Fair Competition approved August 19, 1933, shall continue in full force and effect.

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises

Policy Areas & Topics

🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight)
§

"When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"Power is of an encroaching nature, and it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." — Federalist No. 48 (1788)

Madison would view this order with watchful scrutiny. Operating in the 'Zone of Twilight' where Congress is silent, each such directive establishes an administrative precedent that steadily expands the executive perimeter at the expense of legislative primacy.

Madisonian Stance: Vigilant / Cautionary
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)

Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.

Hamiltonian Stance: Defends Vigor & Dispatch
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)

The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.

Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

⚖️ Discretionary Twilight Zone
42 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Moderate Friction

Administers commerce or fiscal programs requiring ongoing statutory delegation and legislative oversight.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Low Friction

Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

Moderate Friction

Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Moderate Friction

Applies regulatory or compliance standards to private contractors or commercial entities.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Moderate Friction

The order relies on inherent Article II executive discretion, civil service management, or foreign diplomacy where Congress has neither expressly approved nor prohibited action.

Benchmark: Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
525
3,240 characters
Estimated Read Time
3 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
25.6
Post-Graduate Legal
Language Tone Score
+0.02
Constitutional Neutral
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

An application having been duly made pursuant to and in full compliance with the provisions of Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act approved June 16, 1933, for my approval of certain amendments to the Code of Fair Competition of the Iron and Steel Industry as approved on August 19, 1933, a copy of which amendments are hereto attached as Exhibit A, and the Administrator, having rendered his report showing that said amendments have been proposed, adopted and submitted for my approval, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1 of Article XII of said Code and having recommended that said application be granted; Now, Therefore, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt , President of the United States, pursuant to the authority vested in me by Title 1 of said Act, and otherwise, do adopt and approve the report, recommendations and findings of the Administrator and do hereby order that said amendments to said Code be, and they hereby are, approved and that said Code as amended by said amendments, a copy of which is hereto attached as Exhibit B, be and it hereby is approved, said revised Code incorporating said amendments to become effective on June 11, 1934, prior to which effective date the Code of Fair Competition approved August 19, 1933, shall continue in full force and effect. In connection with the foregoing approval I desire to make two statements: 1. Conditions of economic emergency make necessary the retention in modified form of the multiple basing point system adopted in the original code and effective in the industry for many years. But revisions made in this Code, increasing substantially the number of basing points, and modifications in practice under the Code, while alleviating some of the inequities in the existing system, illustrate the desirability of working toward the end of having prices quoted on the basis of areas of production and the eventual establishment of basing points coincident with all such areas, as well as the elimination of artificial transportation charges in price quotations. Therefore, I have directed the Federal Trade Commission and the National Recovery Administration to study further and jointly the operation of the basing point system and its effect on prices to consumers, and any effects of the existing system in either permitting or encouraging price fixing, or providing unfair competitive advantages for producers, or disadvantages for consumers not based on natural causes. I have requested that the results of this study be reported to me within six months, together with any recommendations for revisions of the Code, in accordance with the conclusions reached. 2. In order to insure the free exercise of the rights of employees under the provisions of Section 7 of this Act and of Article IV of this Code, I will undertake promptly to provide, as the occasion may demand, for the election by employees in each industrial unit of representatives of their own choosing for the purpose of collective bargaining and other mutual aid and protection, under the supervision of an appropriate governmental agency and in accordance with suitable rules and regulations. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT Approval Recommended: Hugh S Johnson Administrator. The White House, May 30, 1934.

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 6730 (May 30, 1934), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-6730-revised-code-fair-competition-the-iron-and-steel-industry.