★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 6877 ⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight Constitutional Neutral (+0.02) 📜 Art. II §1: Executive Discretion & Internal Operations

Executive Order 6877—Creating Wool Textile Work Assignment Board, Etc.

•
Tuesday, October 16, 1934
•
2 min read (490 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 2 min read (490 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

Representations having been made to me by the Code Authority for the Wool Textile Industry that paragraph 2 of Section 3 of the Code of Fair Competition for the Wool Textile Industry already provides for a freezing period as respects work assignments as recommended by the Board of Inquiry for the Cotton Textile Industry, created by Executive Order No. 6840, dated September 5, 1934, embodied in the report of said Board, submitted to me on September 17, 1934, and upon finding accordingly; and application having been made by the sponsors of the Code in a letter dated July 25, 1933, which stated: "In order to prevent abuses, without hampering progress, we hereby request the Administrator to appoint a committee to study this problem in order…

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight
Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
📜 Art. II §1: Executive Discretion & Internal Operations
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Executive Branch Departments General Body of the People

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on October 16, 1934, this order concerns Creating Wool Textile Work Assignment Board, Etc. Representations having been made to me by the Code Authority for the Wool Textile Industry that paragraph 2 of Section 3 of the Code of Fair Competition for the Wool Textile Industry already provides for a freezing period as respects work assignments as recommended by the Board of Inquiry for the Cotton Textile Industry, created by Executive Order No. 6840, dated September 5, 1934, embodied in the report of said…

Constitutional Assessment: This action represents an orderly exercise of Article II administrative discretion, managing the internal machinery and personnel of the executive branch without abridging the ancient liberties of the people.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

Representations having been made to me by the Code Authority for the Wool Textile Industry that paragraph 2 of Section 3 of the Code of Fair Competition for the Wool Textile Industry already provides for a freezing period as respects work assignments as recommended by the Board of Inquiry for the Cotton Textile Industry, created by Executive Order No. 6840, dated September 5, 1934, embodied in the report of said Board, submitted to me on September 17, 1934, and upon finding accordingly; and application having been made by the sponsors of the Code in a letter dated July 25, 1933, which stated: "In order to prevent abuses, without hampering progress, we hereby request the Administrator to appoint a committee to study this problem in order…

▪

The Textile Labor Relations Board shall appoint a Wool Textile Work Assignment Board, to be composed of an impartial chairman, one representative of the employers subject to the Code of Fair Competition for the Wool Textile Industry, and one representative of the employees in that industry. 2.

▪

The Wool Textile Work Assignment Board is hereby charged with the responsibility of administering said paragraph 2 of Section 3 of said Code, in accordance with the following principles: (a) No employer shall extend the number of similar looms, frames, spindles or other machines or equipment tended by any class of employee unless there is a compensating change in the operation, including a change in the quality or character of the product or material processed or manufactured.

▪

The Wool Textile Work Assignment Board may, on petition of any mill which installs labor saving machinery, after such investigation as it may deem proper, authorize the employer to increase labor assignments to the extent only that the amount of work required of the employees affected will not be increased by the installation of this machinery.

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Executive Branch Departments 🏛️ General Body of the People

Policy Areas & Topics

🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight)
§

"When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"Power is of an encroaching nature, and it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." — Federalist No. 48 (1788)

Madison would view this order with watchful scrutiny. Operating in the 'Zone of Twilight' where Congress is silent, each such directive establishes an administrative precedent that steadily expands the executive perimeter at the expense of legislative primacy.

Madisonian Stance: Vigilant / Cautionary
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)

Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.

Hamiltonian Stance: Defends Vigor & Dispatch
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)

The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.

Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

⚖️ Discretionary Twilight Zone
38 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Moderate Friction

Administers commerce or fiscal programs requiring ongoing statutory delegation and legislative oversight.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Low Friction

Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

Moderate Friction

Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Low Friction

Focuses on internal governmental operations with no direct impairment of private rights or property.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Moderate Friction

The order relies on inherent Article II executive discretion, civil service management, or foreign diplomacy where Congress has neither expressly approved nor prohibited action.

Benchmark: Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
490
2,959 characters
Estimated Read Time
2 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
25.6
Post-Graduate Legal
Language Tone Score
+0.02
Constitutional Neutral
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

Representations having been made to me by the Code Authority for the Wool Textile Industry that paragraph 2 of Section 3 of the Code of Fair Competition for the Wool Textile Industry already provides for a freezing period as respects work assignments as recommended by the Board of Inquiry for the Cotton Textile Industry, created by Executive Order No. 6840, dated September 5, 1934, embodied in the report of said Board, submitted to me on September 17, 1934, and upon finding accordingly; and application having been made by the sponsors of the Code in a letter dated July 25, 1933, which stated: "In order to prevent abuses, without hampering progress, we hereby request the Administrator to appoint a committee to study this problem in order to insure a practical definition of improper speeding up of work and to avoid its harmful results," Now, Therefore, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt , President of the United States, pursuant to authority vested in me by Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, and otherwise, do issue the following rules and regulations for the administration of said paragraph 2 of Section 3 of said Code until February 1, 1935: 1. The Textile Labor Relations Board shall appoint a Wool Textile Work Assignment Board, to be composed of an impartial chairman, one representative of the employers subject to the Code of Fair Competition for the Wool Textile Industry, and one representative of the employees in that industry. 2. The Wool Textile Work Assignment Board is hereby charged with the responsibility of administering said paragraph 2 of Section 3 of said Code, in accordance with the following principles: (a) No employer shall extend the number of similar looms, frames, spindles or other machines or equipment tended by any class of employee unless there is a compensating change in the operation, including a change in the quality or character of the product or material processed or manufactured. (b) The Wool Textile Work Assignment Board may, on petition of any mill which installs labor saving machinery, after such investigation as it may deem proper, authorize the employer to increase labor assignments to the extent only that the amount of work required of the employees affected will not be increased by the installation of this machinery. (c) On petition of the representatives of labor, on its own motion, or otherwise, the Wool Textile Work Assignment Board may investigate any case where it is alleged that the work load has been improperly increased since July 1, 1933, in violation of the Code and may require its reduction if it finds that the assignment has been so increased. 3. The Wool Textile Work Assignment Board shall have authority to appoint district impartial chairmen and such other agents as it sees fit, and to issue such rules and regulations as it deems necessary to carry out the foregoing provisions. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT The White House, October 16, 1934.

🔗

Referenced By Later Executive Orders (1)

Subsequent presidents who cited, amended, continued, or revoked this directive in later orders.

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 6877 (Oct. 16, 1934), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-6877-creating-wool-textile-work-assignment-board-etc.