★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 7029 🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority Constitutional Neutral (+0.02) 📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution

Executive Order 7029—Allocation of Funds to the Department of Agriculture for Emergency Conservation Work

•
Tuesday, April 30, 1935
•
2 min read (302 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 2 min read (302 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

The sum of $400,000 is hereby allocated from the appropriation made by the said Act to the Director, Emergency Conservation Work, for immediate transfer to the credit of the Department of Agriculture, subject to requisition by the Secretary of Agriculture, for prosecuting the conservation work provided for by Executive Order No. 6208 dated July 21, 1933, as amended by Executive Order No. 6787 dated June 30, 1934, Executive Order No. 6724 dated May 28, 1934, and Executive Order No. 6766 dated June 29, 1934.

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority
Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants Public Health & Medical Institutions Financial Institutions & Monetary Authorities

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on April 30, 1935, this order concerns Allocation of Funds to the Department of Agriculture for Emergency Conservation Work. The sum of $400,000 is hereby allocated from the appropriation made by the said Act to the Director, Emergency Conservation Work, for immediate transfer to the credit of the Department of Agriculture, subject to requisition by the Secretary of Agriculture, for prosecuting the conservation work provided for by Executive Order No. 6208 dated July 21, 1933, as amended by Executive Order No. 6787 dated June 30, 1934…

Constitutional Assessment: This action represents an orderly exercise of Article II administrative discretion, managing the internal machinery and personnel of the executive branch without abridging the ancient liberties of the people.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

The sum of $400,000 is hereby allocated from the appropriation made by the said Act to the Director, Emergency Conservation Work, for immediate transfer to the credit of the Department of Agriculture, subject to requisition by the Secretary of Agriculture, for prosecuting the conservation work provided for by Executive Order No. 6208 dated July 21, 1933, as amended by Executive Order No. 6787 dated June 30, 1934, Executive Order No. 6724 dated May 28, 1934, and Executive Order No. 6766 dated June 29, 1934.

▪

For the purposes of this allocation the Secretary of Agriculture is hereby authorized to employ the services and means mentioned in subdivision (a) of section 3 of the said Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935, to the extent therein provided, and, within the limitations prescribed by the said section, to exercise the authority with respect to personnel conferred by subdivision (b) thereof, and he is further authorized in the acquisition of real property or any interest therein to acquire the same by the power of eminent domain, when necessary.

▪

Acquisition of articles, materials, and supplies for use in carrying out any project authorized by this order shall be subject to the provisions of Title III of the Treasury and Post Office Act, fiscal year 1934 (47 Stat. 1489, 1520).

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants 🏛️ Public Health & Medical Institutions 🏛️ Financial Institutions & Monetary Authorities
🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority)
§

"When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"The constitutional magistracy was designed not to invent policy, but to be the faithful instrument of the laws passed by the people's representatives." — Speech in the First Congress (1789)

Madison would approve the structural posture of this order. The President acts strictly in subordination to statutory authority granted under Article II, Section 3 ("take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). The checks and balances hold firm because the policy origin remains with the legislature.

Madisonian Stance: Concurring (Statutory)
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"The direction of war implies the direction of the common strength; and the power of directing and employing the common strength must be under the direction of the single hand of the Executive." — Federalist No. 74 (1788)

Hamilton would forcefully champion executive discretion here. For foreign entanglements, commerce defense, and national security, deliberative assemblies are too slow and faction-ridden. A unified, energetic Executive exercising swift command is precisely what the Philadelphia Convention intended for national preservation.

Hamiltonian Stance: Supportive of Execution
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)

The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.

Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

🛡️ High Constitutional Concordance
26 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Moderate Friction

Administers commerce or fiscal programs requiring ongoing statutory delegation and legislative oversight.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Low Friction

Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

Low Friction

Confined strictly to internal federal jurisdiction, federal property, or direct military command.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Low Friction

Focuses on internal governmental operations with no direct impairment of private rights or property.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Low Friction

The President operates strictly as the constitutional Chief Executive, carrying out policy established by Congress with strong statutory backing.

Benchmark: Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates in close harmony with statutory authority and standard Article II supervisory execution.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
302
1,836 characters
Estimated Read Time
2 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
14.7
College Level
Language Tone Score
+0.02
Constitutional Neutral
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

Whereas continued prosecution of emergency conservation work under the provisions of the act of March 31, 1933, c. 17, 48 Stat. 22, as continued by the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935, approved April 8, 1935 (Pub. Res. No. 11, 74th Cong.), will provide relief and work relief and will increase employment by providing for useful projects: Now, Therefore , by virtue of and pursuant to the authority vested in me by the said Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935, the sum of $400,000 is hereby allocated from the appropriation made by the said Act to the Director, Emergency Conservation Work, for immediate transfer to the credit of the Department of Agriculture, subject to requisition by the Secretary of Agriculture, for prosecuting the conservation work provided for by Executive Order No. 6208 dated July 21, 1933, as amended by Executive Order No. 6787 dated June 30, 1934, Executive Order No. 6724 dated May 28, 1934, and Executive Order No. 6766 dated June 29, 1934. For the purposes of this allocation the Secretary of Agriculture is hereby authorized to employ the services and means mentioned in subdivision (a) of section 3 of the said Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935, to the extent therein provided, and, within the limitations prescribed by the said section, to exercise the authority with respect to personnel conferred by subdivision (b) thereof, and he is further authorized in the acquisition of real property or any interest therein to acquire the same by the power of eminent domain, when necessary. Acquisition of articles, materials, and supplies for use in carrying out any project authorized by this order shall be subject to the provisions of Title III of the Treasury and Post Office Act, fiscal year 1934 (47 Stat. 1489, 1520). FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT The White House, April 30, 1935.

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 7029 (Apr. 30, 1935), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-7029-allocation-funds-the-department-agriculture-for-emergency.