★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
🎲
Cite
Executive Order 7577 🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority Constitutional Fidelity (+0.55) 📜 10th Amend: Intergovernmental Federalism Cooperation

Executive Order 7577—Amending the Instructions to Diplomatic Officers and the Consular Regulations

Franklin D. Roosevelt Franklin D. Roosevelt
•
Wednesday, March 17, 1937
•
2 min read (399 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 2 min read (399 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

Section XV-4 of the Instructions to Diplomatic Officers and section 451 of the Consular Regulations be, and they are hereby, amended to read as follows: " Presents and testimonial. -No diplomatic or consular officer shall ask or accept for himself or any other person, any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind from any king, prince, or foreign state.

View all 4 directives ↓
⚖️ Constitutional Footing
🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority
Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
📜 10th Amend: Intergovernmental Federalism Cooperation
Framers' constitutional debate ↓
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Sovereign State Governments & Localities Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants Private Citizens & Property Owners Foreign Nations & International Entities
Inspect unabridged text ↓

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on March 17, 1937, this order concerns Amending the Instructions to Diplomatic Officers and the Consular Regulations. Section XV-4 of the Instructions to Diplomatic Officers and section 451 of the Consular Regulations be, and they are hereby, amended to read as follows: " Presents and testimonial. -No diplomatic or consular officer shall ask or accept for himself or any other person, any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind from any king, prince, or foreign state.

Constitutional Assessment: Reviewed under the Tenth Amendment and the principle of dual federalism, this order touches upon domains traditionally reserved to the sovereign States. The Framers would caution against any attempt to commandeer state officers or displace local police powers through federal executive fiat.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

Section XV-4 of the Instructions to Diplomatic Officers and section 451 of the Consular Regulations be, and they are hereby, amended to read as follows: " Presents and testimonial. -No diplomatic or consular officer shall ask or accept for himself or any other person, any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind from any king, prince, or foreign state.

▪

It resulted in the enactment of the joint resolution approved June 27, 1934 (48 Stat. 1267), which authorized only certain retired officers and employees therein named to accept such decorations, orders, medals, or presents as had been tendered to them by foreign governments.

▪

Hence it appears to be the settled policy of the Congress to decline to authorize the acceptance by civilian officers of the Government in active service of presents, decorations, medals, orders, testimonials, or other things, when presented to or conferred on such officers by any king, prince, or foreign state.

▪

In view of the attitude of the Congress and the policy of the Government, American diplomatic and consular officers are hereby prohibited from accepting in any circumstances any present, decoration, medal, order, testimonial, or other thing that may be tendered to them by any foreign king, prince, or foreign state."

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Sovereign State Governments & Localities 🏛️ Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants 🏛️ Private Citizens & Property Owners 🏛️ Foreign Nations & International Entities

Policy Areas & Topics

🏷️ Foreign Policy & Diplomacy
🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority)
§

"When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"The constitutional magistracy was designed not to invent policy, but to be the faithful instrument of the laws passed by the people's representatives." — Speech in the First Congress (1789)

Madison would approve the structural posture of this order. The President acts strictly in subordination to statutory authority granted under Article II, Section 3 ("take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). The checks and balances hold firm because the policy origin remains with the legislature.

Madisonian Stance: Concurring (Statutory)
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)

Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.

Hamiltonian Stance: Supportive of Execution
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." — 10th Amendment to the US Constitution (1791)

Mason would scrutinize whether this federal directive intrudes into police powers, land stewardship, or municipal domains historically reserved to local citizens. The Anti-Federalist demand is that federal administration must never supplant state self-governance.

Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

🛡️ High Constitutional Concordance
27 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Low Friction

Operates within delegated statutory execution without modifying legislative appropriations or taxing powers.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Low Friction

Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

Moderate Friction

Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Moderate Friction

Applies regulatory or compliance standards to private contractors or commercial entities.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Low Friction

The President operates strictly as the constitutional Chief Executive, carrying out policy established by Congress with strong statutory backing.

Benchmark: Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates in close harmony with statutory authority and standard Article II supervisory execution.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
399
2,481 characters
Estimated Read Time
2 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
16.5
Post-Graduate Legal
Language Tone Score
+0.55
Constitutional Fidelity
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

By virtue of and pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 1752 of the Revised Statutes (U.S.C., title 22, sec. 132), it is ordered that section XV-4 of the Instructions to Diplomatic Officers and section 451 of the Consular Regulations be, and they are hereby, amended to read as follows: " Presents and testimonial. -No diplomatic or consular officer shall ask or accept for himself or any other person, any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind from any king, prince, or foreign state. (U.S. Const., Art. I, see. 9, cl. 8, U.S.C., title 22, § 126.) Any present, decoration, order, or testimonial in acknowledgement of services rendered to the citizens or governments of foreign states, or other thing, which shall be conferred on or presented by any foreign government to any officer of the United States, shall be tendered through the Department of State, and not to the individual in person, but such present, decoration, or other thing shall not be delivered by the Department of State unless so authorized by act of Congress. (5 U.S.C., § 115.) "Thorough consideration was given by the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives in 1934 to the question whether the Congress should consent to the acceptance of presents, decorations, orders, medals, testimonials, or other things. It resulted in the enactment of the joint resolution approved June 27, 1934 (48 Stat. 1267), which authorized only certain retired officers and employees therein named to accept such decorations, orders, medals, or presents as had been tendered to them by foreign governments. Hence it appears to be the settled policy of the Congress to decline to authorize the acceptance by civilian officers of the Government in active service of presents, decorations, medals, orders, testimonials, or other things, when presented to or conferred on such officers by any king, prince, or foreign state. Furthermore, it is contrary to the policy of the Government to tender or to award presents, decorations, medals, orders, testimonials, or other things to representatives of foreign governments. In view of the attitude of the Congress and the policy of the Government, American diplomatic and consular officers are hereby prohibited from accepting in any circumstances any present, decoration, medal, order, testimonial, or other thing that may be tendered to them by any foreign king, prince, or foreign state." FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT The White House, March 19, 1937.

🔗

Referenced By Later Executive Orders (1)

Subsequent presidents who cited, amended, continued, or revoked this directive in later orders.

References Executive Order 8396—Amending the Foreign Service Regulations of the United States
Franklin D. Roosevelt • 1940-04-18
📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations 

Exec. Order No. 7577 (Mar. 17, 1937), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-7577-amending-the-instructions-diplomatic-officers-and-the-consular.