★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 7965 🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority Constitutional Neutral (+0.02) 📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution

Executive Order 7965—Regulations To Give Effect to Articles I and II of the Convention Providing for the Recovery and Return of Stolen or Embezzled Motor Vehicles, Trailers, Airplanes or Component Parts of Any of Them, Concluded on October 6, 1936, Between the United States of America and the United Mexican States

•
Monday, August 29, 1938
•
6 min read (1,163 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 6 min read (1,163 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

Whereas the Convention for the recovery and return of stolen or embezzled motor vehicles, trailers, airplanes, or the component parts of any of them, between the United States of America and the United Mexican States, concluded on October 6, 1936, and proclaimed by the President of the United States of America, on June 24, 1937, reads as follows: ARTICLE I. Whenever the Government of the United Mexican States through its Embassy in Washington shall so request the Department of State of the United States of America, that Department will use every proper means to bring about the detention of alleged stolen or embezzled motor vehicles, trailers, airplanes or the component parts of any of them.

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority
Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises Sovereign State Governments & Localities Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants Foreign Nations & International Entities

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 29, 1938, this order concerns Regulations To Give Effect to Articles I and II of the Convention Providing for the Recovery and Return of Stolen or Embezzled Motor Vehicles, Trailers, Airplanes or Component Parts of Any of Them, Concluded on October 6, 1936, Between the United States of America and the United Mexican States. Whereas the Convention for the recovery and return of stolen or embezzled motor vehicles, trailers, airplanes, or the component parts of any of them, between the United States of America and the United Mexican States, concluded on October 6, 1936, and proclaimed by the President of the United States of America, on June 24, 1937, reads as follows: ARTICLE I. Whenever the Government of the United Mexican States…

Constitutional Assessment: This action represents an orderly exercise of Article II administrative discretion, managing the internal machinery and personnel of the executive branch without abridging the ancient liberties of the people.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

Whereas the Convention for the recovery and return of stolen or embezzled motor vehicles, trailers, airplanes, or the component parts of any of them, between the United States of America and the United Mexican States, concluded on October 6, 1936, and proclaimed by the President of the United States of America, on June 24, 1937, reads as follows: ARTICLE I. Whenever the Government of the United Mexican States through its Embassy in Washington shall so request the Department of State of the United States of America, that Department will use every proper means to bring about the detention of alleged stolen or embezzled motor vehicles, trailers, airplanes or the component parts of any of them.

▪

The request of the Embassy shall be accompanied by documents legally valid in the United Mexican States supporting the claim of the person or persons interested to the property the return of which is requested.

▪

After the property shall have been detained, and in the absence of evidence conclusively controverting the proof just before mentioned, it will be delivered to the person or persons designated for such purpose by the Embassy in Washington of the United Mexican States.

▪

Whenever the Government of the United States of America through its Embassy in Mexico City shall so request the Department of Foreign Relations of the United Mexican States, that Department will use every proper means to bring about the detention of alleged stolen or embezzled motor vehicles, trailers, airplanes or the component parts of any of them.

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises 🏛️ Sovereign State Governments & Localities 🏛️ Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants 🏛️ Foreign Nations & International Entities

Policy Areas & Topics

🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority)
§

"When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"The constitutional magistracy was designed not to invent policy, but to be the faithful instrument of the laws passed by the people's representatives." — Speech in the First Congress (1789)

Madison would approve the structural posture of this order. The President acts strictly in subordination to statutory authority granted under Article II, Section 3 ("take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). The checks and balances hold firm because the policy origin remains with the legislature.

Madisonian Stance: Concurring (Statutory)
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"The direction of war implies the direction of the common strength; and the power of directing and employing the common strength must be under the direction of the single hand of the Executive." — Federalist No. 74 (1788)

Hamilton would forcefully champion executive discretion here. For foreign entanglements, commerce defense, and national security, deliberative assemblies are too slow and faction-ridden. A unified, energetic Executive exercising swift command is precisely what the Philadelphia Convention intended for national preservation.

Hamiltonian Stance: Supportive of Execution
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)

The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.

Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

⚖️ Discretionary Twilight Zone
48 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Moderate Friction

Administers commerce or fiscal programs requiring ongoing statutory delegation and legislative oversight.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Low Friction

Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

High Friction

Creates friction with the Tenth Amendment by conditioning state grants, mandating local compliance, or preempting state police powers.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

High Friction

Scrutinized under the Bill of Rights for potential impact on private contracts, property rights, or procedural due process.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Low Friction

The President operates strictly as the constitutional Chief Executive, carrying out policy established by Congress with strong statutory backing.

Benchmark: Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
1,163
7,018 characters
Estimated Read Time
6 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
22.1
Post-Graduate Legal
Language Tone Score
+0.02
Constitutional Neutral
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

Whereas the Convention for the recovery and return of stolen or embezzled motor vehicles, trailers, airplanes, or the component parts of any of them, between the United States of America and the United Mexican States, concluded on October 6, 1936, and proclaimed by the President of the United States of America, on June 24, 1937, reads as follows: ARTICLE I. Whenever the Government of the United Mexican States through its Embassy in Washington shall so request the Department of State of the United States of America, that Department will use every proper means to bring about the detention of alleged stolen or embezzled motor vehicles, trailers, airplanes or the component parts of any of them. The request of the Embassy shall be accompanied by documents legally valid in the United Mexican States supporting the claim of the person or persons interested to the property the return of which is requested. After the property shall have been detained, and in the absence of evidence conclusively controverting the proof just before mentioned, it will be delivered to the person or persons designated for such purpose by the Embassy in Washington of the United Mexican States. ARTICLE II. Whenever the Government of the United States of America through its Embassy in Mexico City shall so request the Department of Foreign Relations of the United Mexican States, that Department will use every proper means to bring about the detention of alleged stolen or embezzled motor vehicles, trailers, airplanes or the component parts of any of them. The request of the Embassy shall be accompanied by documents legally valid in the United States of America supporting the claim of the person or persons interested to the property the return of which is requested. After the property shall have been detained, and in the absence of evidence conclusively controverting the proof just before mentioned, it will be delivered to the person or persons designated for such purpose by the Embassy in Mexico City of the United States of America. ARTICLE III. When the stolen or embezzled property is held as evidence in a criminal case, in the country where recovered, such detention shall not exceed twenty days from the date of the presentation to the Department of State or the Department of Foreign Relations, as the case may be, of the official request for the return of the property. ARTICLE IV. The High Contracting Parties will extend all necessary customs and other facilities in order that the person or persons on whose behalf the return has been made shall receive the stolen property and return with it to the territory of the country from which the request emanated. ARTICLE V. The High Contracting Parties will not assess any duties, fines or other monetary penalties upon the property detained and returned under the terms and provisions of this Convention. All expenses incident to the return and delivery of the property to the requesting country shall be borne by the person or persons receiving the vehicles or their component parts and such person or persons shall have no claim for compensation against the detaining authorities for damages to the property in connection with its seizure, detention and storage. ARTICLE VI. The High Contracting Parties will ratify this Convention in accordance with the provisions of their respective Constitutions and the exchange of ratifications shall take place in the City of Mexico as soon as possible. This Convention shall remain in force for one year from the date of exchange of ratifications. If upon the expiration of one year notice is not given by either High Contracting Party of the desire to terminate the same, it shall continue in force until thirty days after either party shall have given notice to the other of the desire to terminate it. In witness whereof, the respective Plenipotentiaries have signed and affixed their seals to this Convention. Done in duplicate, in English and Spanish, at Mexico City, this sixth day of the month of October one thousand nine hundred and thirty six. Josephus Daniels [seal] Eduardo Hays [seal] Whereas it is desirable that uniform regulations should be established by the Government of the United States of America and the United Mexican States to give effect to the provisions of Articles I and II of the Convention; and Whereas the following regulations have been agreed upon by representatives of the two Governments and have been submitted to me for approval on the part of the United States of America: ARTICLE I. Whenever, in accordance with the provisions of Article I of the Convention, the United Mexican States shall request the detention in the United States of America of alleged stolen or embezzled motor vehicles, trailers, airplanes, or the component parts of any of them, the request shall be accompanied by documents legally valid in the .United Mexican States. The said documents shall be as follows: (1) the original or a certified copy of the sales or conditional sales contract and where registration of title is required by law the certificate of such registration of title; (2) the original or a certified copy of the official registration card; (3) not more than three affidavits identifying the claimant as the owner of the legal or equitable title, or both, to the property alleged to have been stolen or embezzled; (4) the original or a certified copy of any assignment of the property by the insured to the insurer pursuant to a contract of insurance in force at the time the theft or embezzlement was committed. ARTICLE II. Whenever, in accordance with the provisions of Article II of the Convention, the United States of America shall request the detention in the United Mexican States of alleged stolen or embezzled motor vehicles, trailers, airplanes, or the component parts of any of them, the request shall be accompanied by documents legally valid in the United States of America. The said documents shall be as follows: (1) the original or a certified copy of the sales or conditional sales contract and where registration of title is required by law the certificate of such registration of title; (2) the original or a certified copy of the official registration card; (3) not more than three affidavits identifying the claimant as the owner of the legal or equitable title, or both, to the property alleged to have been stolen or embezzled; (4) the original or a certified copy of any assignment of the property by the insured to the insurer pursuant to a contract of insurance in force at the time the theft or embezzlement was committed. Now, Therefore, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt , President of the United States of America, considering it expedient and necessary for the enforcement of the provisions of the said Convention of October 6, 1936, that uniform regulations for that purpose be adopted by the two Governments, do hereby approve the foregoing regulations. This Order shall become effective on September 1, 1938. FRANKLIN D ROOSEVELT The White House, August 29, 1938.

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 7965 (Aug. 29, 1938), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-7965-regulations-give-effect-articles-i-and-ii-the-convention-providing.