★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 14402 🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority Constitutional Fidelity (+0.69) 📜 Art. II §2: Commander-in-Chief Supervisory Authority

Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting

•
Thursday, April 30, 2026
•
6 min read (1,260 words)
•
91 Fed. Reg. 24325

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 6 min read (1,260 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

To the maximum extent consistent with law, and except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, executive branch departments and agencies (agencies) shall, in procurement, utilize fixed-price contracts, which for purposes of this order shall mean fixed-price contracts as defined in Part 16 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, codified at title 48, Code of Federal Regulations , or contracts that tie profit to performance-based metrics when appropriate.

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority
Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
📜 Art. II §2: Commander-in-Chief Supervisory Authority
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Armed Forces & Military Establishments Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Donald Trump on April 30, 2026, this order concerns Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting. The American people expect their Government to operate with integrity, efficiency, and transparency. For too long, Federal procurement has tolerated unpredictable costs, bloated overhead, and weak performance incentives. The United States Government must adopt the best business practices to protect taxpayer dollars, hold contractors accountable, and achieve demonstrable returns on investment.

Constitutional Assessment: Scrutinized through Article II, Section 2, this action exercises the President's constitutional role as Commander in Chief. Early Framers recognized broad executive discretion in commanding military forces during conflict, provided it remains bounded by congressional declarations and respects civilian domestic courts.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪
Default to Fixed-Price Contracting

To the maximum extent consistent with law, and except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, executive branch departments and agencies (agencies) shall, in procurement, utilize fixed-price contracts, which for purposes of this order shall mean fixed-price contracts as defined in Part 16 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, codified at title 48, Code of Federal Regulations , or contracts that tie profit to performance-based metrics when appropriate.

▪
Implementation

Within 45 days of the date of this order, the Director of OMB shall issue guidance to agencies to ensure consistent implementation of this order.

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Armed Forces & Military Establishments 🏛️ Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants
🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority)
§

"When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"The constitutional magistracy was designed not to invent policy, but to be the faithful instrument of the laws passed by the people's representatives." — Speech in the First Congress (1789)

Madison would approve the structural posture of this order. The President acts strictly in subordination to statutory authority granted under Article II, Section 3 ("take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). The checks and balances hold firm because the policy origin remains with the legislature.

Madisonian Stance: Concurring (Statutory)
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"The direction of war implies the direction of the common strength; and the power of directing and employing the common strength must be under the direction of the single hand of the Executive." — Federalist No. 74 (1788)

Hamilton would forcefully champion executive discretion here. For foreign entanglements, commerce defense, and national security, deliberative assemblies are too slow and faction-ridden. A unified, energetic Executive exercising swift command is precisely what the Philadelphia Convention intended for national preservation.

Hamiltonian Stance: Strong Prerogative Support
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)

The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.

Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

⚖️ Discretionary Twilight Zone
40 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Moderate Friction

Administers commerce or fiscal programs requiring ongoing statutory delegation and legislative oversight.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Moderate Friction

Directs internal executive branch machinery, agency workflows, and federal personnel.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

Moderate Friction

Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Moderate Friction

Applies regulatory or compliance standards to private contractors or commercial entities.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Low Friction

The President operates strictly as the constitutional Chief Executive, carrying out policy established by Congress with strong statutory backing.

Benchmark: Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
1,260
8,508 characters
Estimated Read Time
6 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
20.6
Post-Graduate Legal
Language Tone Score
+0.69
Constitutional Fidelity
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document
FR Page 24325

Executive Order 14402 of April 30, 2026 Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1 . #sec-1

Purpose . The American people expect their Government to operate with integrity, efficiency, and transparency. For too long, Federal procurement has tolerated unpredictable costs, bloated overhead, and weak performance incentives. The United States Government must adopt the best business practices to protect taxpayer dollars, hold contractors accountable, and achieve demonstrable returns on investment. Many private-sector contracts focus on driving performance rather than ever-increasing costs, often dictating a fixed cost for a well-defined outcome. Fixed-price contracts are characterized by clearly defined outcomes and deliverables on predictable timelines for fixed prices that generally are not adjusted based on contractors' costs, and often tie profit to the contractors' performance, rewarding work that exceeds expectations and penalizing subpar performance. This performance-based model encourages contractors to control costs and expeditiously meet deliverables to maximize profits. Many Government contracts, however, operate on what is known as a “cost-reimbursement” model. Under that model, Government contractors are guaranteed reimbursement for their allowable incurred costs, and may receive profit margins on top of expenses. Cost-reimbursement contracts frequently allow for poorly defined product or service deliverables and increase the Government's exposure to overspending by providing little incentive to control costs. A review of spending across the Government in Fiscal Year 2024 identified approximately $120 billion obligated on cost-reimbursement consulting contracts alone. While there are circumstances in which cost-reimbursement contracting is appropriate, such as research and the pre-production developmental phase of major systems acquisition, it should be the exception, granted only in limited circumstances and with appropriate senior-level accountability at the agency. To ensure that Government contracts incentivize performance rather than cost inflation, it is the policy of my Administration that fixed-price contracts with performance-based considerations should serve as the default and preferred method of procurement in order to advance cost predictability and budget discipline, appropriate contractor incentives and accountability, and streamlined procurement and contract administration.

Sec. 2 . #sec-2

Default to Fixed-Price Contracting . (a) To the maximum extent consistent with law, and except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, executive branch departments and agencies (agencies) shall, in procurement, utilize fixed-price contracts, which for purposes of this order shall mean fixed-price contracts as defined in Part 16 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, codified at title 48, Code of Federal Regulations , or contracts that tie profit to performance-based metrics when appropriate. (b)(i) Use of any non-fixed-price contract, including a cost-reimbursement contract, a time-and-material contract, a labor-hour contract, or any other non-fixed-price type of contract under Part 16 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, must be justified in writing by the contracting officer to the agency head.

FR Page 24326

(ii) If the value of a non-fixed-price contract, or in the case of a hybrid contract, the value of the non-fixed-price portion of the contract, exceeds the following value, then the agency head must approve the contract in writing: (A) $100 million, in the case of a Department of War contract; (B) $35 million, in the case of a National Aeronautics and Space Administration contract; (C) $25 million, in the case of a Department of Homeland Security contract; or (D) $10 million, in the case of a contract involving an agency other than the Department of War, the Department of Homeland Security, or the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (iii) Agency heads may delegate approval under subsection (b)(ii) of this section to appropriate non-career employees within the agency. (iv) Subsection (b)(ii) of this section shall not apply to contracts that: (A) support response to an emergency, major disaster, or contingency operation as defined in Part 2 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation; or (B) involve research and development or pre-production development for major systems acquisition, as governed by Parts 34-35 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. (c)(i) Within 90 days of the date of this order, each agency head shall review and, to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with law, seek to modify, restructure, or renegotiate its 10 largest non-fixed-price contracts by dollar value (including non-fixed-price contracts entered into on behalf of another agency) to facilitate use of fixed prices and performance-based incentives for contract deliverables to the maximum extent practicable. (ii) Subsection (c)(i) of this section shall not apply to contracts that involve research and development or pre-production development for major systems acquisition, as governed by Parts 34-35 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, or contracts that support response to an emergency, major disaster, or contingency operation as defined in Part 2 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. (d) Each agency head shall report semi-annually to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the number of, value of, and written justifications for, any non-fixed-price contracts approved under subsection (b) of this section. Agency heads shall submit the first report no later than 90 days after the date of this order. As part of the first report, agency heads shall identify opportunities, beyond the contracts identified in subsection (c) of this section, for adjusting current non-fixed-price contracts toward fixed-price contracts. (e) The requirements in this section apply, to the maximum extent practicable, whether an agency is entering into contracts on its own behalf or on behalf of another agency. (f) When necessary to comply with the provisions of this section before the amendments contemplated by section 3(b) of this order are completed, agencies shall utilize applicable deviations from provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, to the maximum extent practicable.

Sec. 3 . #sec-3

Implementation . (a) Within 45 days of the date of this order, the Director of OMB shall issue guidance to agencies to ensure consistent implementation of this order. (b) Within 120 days of the date of this order, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall: (i) propose, in coordination with the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, amendments to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, consistent with the policy in section 1 of this order; and

FR Page 24327

(ii) develop, in coordination with Defense Acquisition University and the Federal Acquisition Institute, a program that agencies shall use to train program and contracting employees on the formation, use, negotiation, and management of fixed-price contracts to minimize exceptions from section 2(a) of this order.

Sec. 4 . #sec-4

Severability . If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

Sec. 5 . #sec-5

General Provisions . (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. (d) The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Office of Management and Budget.

THE WHITE HOUSE, #signature

April 30, 2026.

🏛️Official NARA Filing:FR Doc. 2026-08900 Filed 5-4-26; 11:15 am
Billing Codes: 3110-01-P
📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 14,402, 91 Fed. Reg. 24,325 (Apr. 30, 2026).