★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
🎲
Cite
Executive Order 10171 🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority Constitutional Fidelity (+0.23) 📜 Art. II §2: Commander-in-Chief Supervisory Authority

Executive Order 10171—Transferring Occupation Functions in Austria to the Department of State

Harry S Truman Harry S Truman
•
Thursday, October 12, 1950
•
2 min read (441 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 2 min read (441 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

There are hereby vested in the Department of State, except as hereinafter provided the responsibilities and obligations of the United States in connection with the occupation of Austria, including the controls defined in the Agreement on the Machinery of Control in Austria dated June 28, 1946.

View all 4 directives ↓
⚖️ Constitutional Footing
🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority
Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
📜 Art. II §2: Commander-in-Chief Supervisory Authority
Framers' constitutional debate ↓
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Armed Forces & Military Establishments Sovereign State Governments & Localities Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants Private Citizens & Property Owners
Inspect unabridged text ↓

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Harry S Truman on October 12, 1950, this order concerns Transferring Occupation Functions in Austria to the Department of State. There are hereby vested in the Department of State, except as hereinafter provided the responsibilities and obligations of the United States in connection with the occupation of Austria, including the controls defined in the Agreement on the Machinery of Control in Austria dated June 28, 1946.

Constitutional Assessment: Scrutinized through Article II, Section 2, this action exercises the President's constitutional role as Commander in Chief. Early Framers recognized broad executive discretion in commanding military forces during conflict, provided it remains bounded by congressional declarations and respects civilian domestic courts.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

There are hereby vested in the Department of State, except as hereinafter provided the responsibilities and obligations of the United States in connection with the occupation of Austria, including the controls defined in the Agreement on the Machinery of Control in Austria dated June 28, 1946.

▪

There are transferred to the Department of State such unobligated balances of the appropriation for Government and Relief in Occupied Areas for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1951 and such property, including records, as the Director of the Bureau of the Budget shall determine to relate primarily to the functions herein transferred. 2.

▪

The United States High Commissioner for Austria shall continue to be the supreme United States authority in Austria, shall be the Chief of the United States diplomatic mission, and shall be responsible, under the immediate supervision of the Secretary of State, for the total governmental program of the United States in Austria, including representation of the United States in the Allied Commission for Austria: Provided, That (1) with respect to military matters as mutually defined by the Department of State and the Department of Defense the Commanding General, United States Forces in Austria, shall continue to receive instructions directly from the joint Chiefs of Staff, and (2) the chief of the special mission of the Economic Cooperation…

▪

On request of the High Commissioner, or in accordance with his instructions from the Joint Chiefs of Staff in respect of military matters, the Commanding General shall take all necessary measures to protect United States interests in Austria and whatever action may be considered essential to preserve law and order and safeguard the security of United States troops and personnel. 4.

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Armed Forces & Military Establishments 🏛️ Sovereign State Governments & Localities 🏛️ Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants 🏛️ Private Citizens & Property Owners 🏛️ Public Health & Medical Institutions

Policy Areas & Topics

🏷️ National Security & Defense 🏷️ Economy & Finance
🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority)
§

"When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"The constitutional magistracy was designed not to invent policy, but to be the faithful instrument of the laws passed by the people's representatives." — Speech in the First Congress (1789)

Madison would approve the structural posture of this order. The President acts strictly in subordination to statutory authority granted under Article II, Section 3 ("take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). The checks and balances hold firm because the policy origin remains with the legislature.

Madisonian Stance: Concurring (Statutory)
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"The direction of war implies the direction of the common strength; and the power of directing and employing the common strength must be under the direction of the single hand of the Executive." — Federalist No. 74 (1788)

Hamilton would forcefully champion executive discretion here. For foreign entanglements, commerce defense, and national security, deliberative assemblies are too slow and faction-ridden. A unified, energetic Executive exercising swift command is precisely what the Philadelphia Convention intended for national preservation.

Hamiltonian Stance: Strong Prerogative Support
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)

The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.

Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

🛡️ High Constitutional Concordance
30 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Low Friction

Operates within delegated statutory execution without modifying legislative appropriations or taxing powers.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Low Friction

Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

High Friction

Creates friction with the Tenth Amendment by conditioning state grants, mandating local compliance, or preempting state police powers.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Low Friction

Focuses on internal governmental operations with no direct impairment of private rights or property.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Low Friction

The President operates strictly as the constitutional Chief Executive, carrying out policy established by Congress with strong statutory backing.

Benchmark: Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates in close harmony with statutory authority and standard Article II supervisory execution.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
441
2,758 characters
Estimated Read Time
2 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
26.7
Post-Graduate Legal
Language Tone Score
+0.23
Constitutional Fidelity
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the Statutes, including Title Ii of Chapter XI of the General Appropriation Act, 1951 (Public Law 759, 81st Congress), and as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the armed forces of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows: 1. There are hereby vested in the Department of State, except as hereinafter provided the responsibilities and obligations of the United States in connection with the occupation of Austria, including the controls defined in the Agreement on the Machinery of Control in Austria dated June 28, 1946. There are transferred to the Department of State such unobligated balances of the appropriation for Government and Relief in Occupied Areas for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1951 and such property, including records, as the Director of the Bureau of the Budget shall determine to relate primarily to the functions herein transferred. 2. The United States High Commissioner for Austria shall continue to be the supreme United States authority in Austria, shall be the Chief of the United States diplomatic mission, and shall be responsible, under the immediate supervision of the Secretary of State, for the total governmental program of the United States in Austria, including representation of the United States in the Allied Commission for Austria: Provided, That (1) with respect to military matters as mutually defined by the Department of State and the Department of Defense the Commanding General, United States Forces in Austria, shall continue to receive instructions directly from the joint Chiefs of Staff, and (2) the chief of the special mission of the Economic Cooperation Administration and his staff shall function in relation to the High Commissioner as described in section 109(b) of the Economic Cooperation Act of 1948 (Public Law 472, 80th Congress), as amended. 3. On request of the High Commissioner, or in accordance with his instructions from the Joint Chiefs of Staff in respect of military matters, the Commanding General shall take all necessary measures to protect United States interests in Austria and whatever action may be considered essential to preserve law and order and safeguard the security of United States troops and personnel. 4. Except as stated above, all representatives of the United States Government in Austria are under the authority of the High Commissioner, who will facilitate the work of United States agencies in Austria and will assist them in their relations with representatives of the Austrian Government, all such relations being subject to his jurisdiction and discretion. 5. This order shall become effective on October 16, 1950. HARRY S. TRUMAN

THE WHITE HOUSE, #signature

October 12, 1950

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations 

Exec. Order No. 10,171 (Oct. 12, 1950), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-10171-transferring-occupation-functions-austria-the-department-state.