★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 11496 🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority Constitutional Neutral (+0.02) 📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution

Executive Order 11496—Regulation Governing the Entry or Withdrawal From Warehouse of Certain Meat With Respect to Which an Agreement Has Been Concluded

•
Friday, November 21, 1969
•
2 min read (379 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 2 min read (379 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

The following regulation governing the entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption of meat, hereinafter specified, shall be effective immediately in order that said agreement entered into with the Government of Honduras may be carried out: No articles provided for in items 106.10 (relating to fresh, chilled, or frozen cattle meat) and 106.20 (relating to fresh, chilled, or frozen meat of goats and sheep (except lambs)) of part 2B, schedule 1, of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, the product of Honduras, may be entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in the United States during the remainder of the calendar year 1969.

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority
Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises Foreign Nations & International Entities

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Richard Nixon on November 21, 1969, this order concerns Regulation Governing the Entry or Withdrawal From Warehouse of Certain Meat With Respect to Which an Agreement Has Been Concluded. The following regulation governing the entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption of meat, hereinafter specified, shall be effective immediately in order that said agreement entered into with the Government of Honduras may be carried out: No articles provided for in items 106.10 (relating to fresh, chilled, or frozen cattle meat) and 106.20 (relating to fresh, chilled, or frozen meat of goats and sheep…

Constitutional Assessment: This action represents an orderly exercise of Article II administrative discretion, managing the internal machinery and personnel of the executive branch without abridging the ancient liberties of the people.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

The following regulation governing the entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption of meat, hereinafter specified, shall be effective immediately in order that said agreement entered into with the Government of Honduras may be carried out: No articles provided for in items 106.10 (relating to fresh, chilled, or frozen cattle meat) and 106.20 (relating to fresh, chilled, or frozen meat of goats and sheep (except lambs)) of part 2B, schedule 1, of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, the product of Honduras, may be entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in the United States during the remainder of the calendar year 1969.

▪

This order shall not apply to meat released under the provisions of section 448 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1448 (b)) prior to the date of this order.

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises 🏛️ Foreign Nations & International Entities
🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority)
§

"When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"The constitutional magistracy was designed not to invent policy, but to be the faithful instrument of the laws passed by the people's representatives." — Speech in the First Congress (1789)

Madison would approve the structural posture of this order. The President acts strictly in subordination to statutory authority granted under Article II, Section 3 ("take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). The checks and balances hold firm because the policy origin remains with the legislature.

Madisonian Stance: Concurring (Statutory)
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"The direction of war implies the direction of the common strength; and the power of directing and employing the common strength must be under the direction of the single hand of the Executive." — Federalist No. 74 (1788)

Hamilton would forcefully champion executive discretion here. For foreign entanglements, commerce defense, and national security, deliberative assemblies are too slow and faction-ridden. A unified, energetic Executive exercising swift command is precisely what the Philadelphia Convention intended for national preservation.

Hamiltonian Stance: Supportive of Execution
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)

The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.

Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

⚖️ Discretionary Twilight Zone
31 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Moderate Friction

Administers commerce or fiscal programs requiring ongoing statutory delegation and legislative oversight.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Low Friction

Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

Moderate Friction

Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Low Friction

Focuses on internal governmental operations with no direct impairment of private rights or property.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Low Friction

The President operates strictly as the constitutional Chief Executive, carrying out policy established by Congress with strong statutory backing.

Benchmark: Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
379
2,316 characters
Estimated Read Time
2 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
17.1
Post-Graduate Legal
Language Tone Score
+0.02
Constitutional Neutral
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

WHEREAS section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 1956 (7 U.S.C. 1854) (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") authorizes the President, whenever he determines such action appropriate, to negotiate with representatives of foreign governments in an effort to obtain agreements limiting the export from such countries and the importation into the United States of any agricultural commodity or product manufactured therefrom, and to issue regulations governing the entry or withdrawal from warehouse of any such commodity or product to carry out any such agreement; and WHEREAS such an agreement was negotiated with the Government of Honduras by which the Government of Honduras agreed that during the calendar year 1969 exports from such country and imports into the United States for consumption of fresh, chilled, or frozen cattle meat (item 106.10 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States) and fresh, chilled, or frozen meat of goats and sheep, except lambs (item 106.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States) would be limited to an aggregate quantity of 14.1 million pounds; and WHEREAS an aggregate quantity in excess of ' 14.1 million pounds of such meat has been exported from Honduras and has been imported into the United States for consumption during the calendar year 1969: Now, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United States, and pursuant to section 204 of the Act, it is hereby ordered that the following regulation governing the entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption of meat, hereinafter specified, shall be effective immediately in order that said agreement entered into with the Government of Honduras may be carried out: No articles provided for in items 106.10 (relating to fresh, chilled, or frozen cattle meat) and 106.20 (relating to fresh, chilled, or frozen meat of goats and sheep (except lambs)) of part 2B, schedule 1, of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, the product of Honduras, may be entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in the United States during the remainder of the calendar year 1969. This order shall not apply to meat released under the provisions of section 448 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1448 (b)) prior to the date of this order. RICHARD NIXON The White House November 21, 1969

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 11,496 (Nov. 21, 1969), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-11496-regulation-governing-the-entry-or-withdrawal-from-warehouse-certain.