The International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (INTELSAT) was established pursuant to the Agreement Relating to the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (INTELSAT), which entered into force February 12, 1973, and the Operating Agreement signed pursuant thereto, TIAS 7532. The United States participates in the Organization pursuant to the authority of the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 419; 47 U.S.C. 701-744). Now, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in me by section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288), it is ordered as follows: SECTION 1. (a) I hereby designate the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (INTEL SAT) as an international organization, as that term is defined in section 4(i) of the International Organizations Immunities Act, entitled to enjoy, on and after February 12, 1973, all of the privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided by section 2 (a) and (d) and section 4 (a), (c), (d), (e), and (f) of that act. (b) The foregoing designation is not intended to abridge in any respect any privileges, exemptions, or immunities which such organization may have acquired or may hereafter acquire by treaty, Congressional action, or other Executive order. SEC. 2. The representatives to the Board of Governors of INTELSAT and their alternates shall enjoy the same privileges, exemptions, and immunities that the representatives to the Interim Communications Satellite Committee and their alternates enjoyed pursuant to Executive Order No. 11227 of June 2,1965. SEC. 3. Executive Order No. 11227 of June 2, 1965 (except for the purpose referred to in section 2 hereof), and Executive Order No. 11277 of April 30, 1966, are hereby revoked. RICHARD NIXON The White House, May 14, 1973.
Executive Order 11718—Designating the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (INTELSAT) as an International Organization Entitled to Enjoy Certain Privileges, Exemptions, and Immunities
Executive Brief • At a Glance
I hereby designate the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (INTEL SAT) as an international organization, as that term is defined in section 4(i) of the International Organizations Immunities Act, entitled to enjoy, on and after February 12, 1973, all of the privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided by section 2 (a) and (d) and section 4 (a), (c), (d), (e), and (f) of that act.
Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis
Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.
Signed by President Richard Nixon on May 14, 1973, this order concerns Designating the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (INTELSAT) as an International Organization Entitled to Enjoy Certain Privileges, Exemptions, and Immunities. I hereby designate the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (INTEL SAT) as an international organization, as that term is defined in section 4(i) of the International Organizations Immunities Act, entitled to enjoy, on and after February 12, 1973, all of the privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided by section 2 (a) and (d) and section 4 (a), (c), (d), (e), and (f) of that act.
Key Directives & Operative Actions
I hereby designate the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (INTEL SAT) as an international organization, as that term is defined in section 4(i) of the International Organizations Immunities Act, entitled to enjoy, on and after February 12, 1973, all of the privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided by section 2 (a) and (d) and section 4 (a), (c), (d), (e), and (f) of that act.
The representatives to the Board of Governors of INTELSAT and their alternates shall enjoy the same privileges, exemptions, and immunities that the representatives to the Interim Communications Satellite Committee and their alternates enjoyed pursuant to Executive Order No. 11227 of June 2,1965.
Executive Order No. 11227 of June 2, 1965 (except for the purpose referred to in section 2 hereof), and Executive Order No. 11277 of April 30, 1966, are hereby revoked.
Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted
Policy Areas & Topics
The Framers' Constitutional Council
1787 PrismEvaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.
"When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate."
James Madison
Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy
"The constitutional magistracy was designed not to invent policy, but to be the faithful instrument of the laws passed by the people's representatives." — Speech in the First Congress (1789)
Madison would approve the structural posture of this order. The President acts strictly in subordination to statutory authority granted under Article II, Section 3 ("take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). The checks and balances hold firm because the policy origin remains with the legislature.
Alexander Hamilton
The Energetic Executive & Unified Command
"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)
Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.
George Mason
Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." — 10th Amendment to the US Constitution (1791)
Mason would scrutinize whether this federal directive intrudes into police powers, land stewardship, or municipal domains historically reserved to local citizens. The Anti-Federalist demand is that federal administration must never supplant state self-governance.
Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions
An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.
Legislative Encroachment & Purse
Operates within delegated statutory execution without modifying legislative appropriations or taxing powers.
Executive Scope & Faithfulness
Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.
Federalism & State Sovereignty
Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.
Due Process & Individual Rights
Focuses on internal governmental operations with no direct impairment of private rights or property.
Youngstown Jacksonian Tier
The President operates strictly as the constitutional Chief Executive, carrying out policy established by Congress with strong statutory backing.
This order operates in close harmony with statutory authority and standard Article II supervisory execution.
Referenced By Later Executive Orders (1)
Subsequent presidents who cited, amended, continued, or revoked this directive in later orders.
Scholarly & Legal Citations
Exec. Order No. 11,718 (May 14, 1973), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-11718-designating-the-international-telecommunications-satellite.