★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 12022 🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority Constitutional Fidelity (+0.29) 📜 5th Amend: Regulatory Execution with Due Process

Executive Order 12022—National Commission for the Review of Antitrust Laws and Procedures

•
Thursday, December 1, 1977
•
4 min read (745 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 4 min read (745 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

There is hereby established the National Commission for the Review of Antitrust Laws and Procedures, hereafter referred to as the Commission.

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority
Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
📜 5th Amend: Regulatory Execution with Due Process
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises Sovereign State Governments & Localities Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants Public Health & Medical Institutions

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Jimmy Carter on December 1, 1977, this order concerns National Commission for the Review of Antitrust Laws and Procedures. Establishment. (a) There is hereby established the National Commission for the Review of Antitrust Laws and Procedures, hereafter referred to as the Commission. (b) The Commission shall consist of fifteen members to be appointed by the President and shall include: (1) The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. (2) The Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission.

Constitutional Assessment: Evaluated against the Fifth Amendment, this action touches upon property or economic rights. An early statesman would insist upon strict adherence to due process of law and the constitutional guarantee that private holdings shall not be encumbered or taken for public purposes without just compensation and lawful process.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

There is hereby established the National Commission for the Review of Antitrust Laws and Procedures, hereafter referred to as the Commission.

▪

The Commission shall consist of fifteen members to be appointed by the President and shall include: (1) The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice.

▪

The President shall designate a Chairman or Cochairmen from among the members of the Commission.

▪

The Commission shall, within the framework of existing antitrust laws (as that term is defined in 15 U.S.C. 12), study and make recommendations on the following subjects: (1) Revision of procedural and substantive rules of law needed to expedite the resolution of complex antitrust cases and development of proposals for making the remedies available in such cases more effective, including: (i) creation of a roster of district court judges knowledgeable regarding antitrust law and large-case problems to whom such cases may be assigned; (ii) revision of pleading requirements in order to narrow as quickly and precisely as possible the scope of contested issues of fact and law; (iii) revision of discovery practices in order to limit expensive…

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises 🏛️ Sovereign State Governments & Localities 🏛️ Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants 🏛️ Public Health & Medical Institutions
🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority)
§

"When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"The constitutional magistracy was designed not to invent policy, but to be the faithful instrument of the laws passed by the people's representatives." — Speech in the First Congress (1789)

Madison would approve the structural posture of this order. The President acts strictly in subordination to statutory authority granted under Article II, Section 3 ("take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). The checks and balances hold firm because the policy origin remains with the legislature.

Madisonian Stance: Concurring (Statutory)
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)

Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.

Hamiltonian Stance: Supportive of Execution
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The purse and the sword ought never to be in the same hands... nor the liberties of the citizen placed at the pleasure of a single magistrate." — Virginia Ratifying Convention (1788)

George Mason and the Anti-Federalists would sound a fierce warning. They feared that Article II would inevitably evolve into an elective monarchy. When an executive order impacts private rights, property, or civil liberties without individualized judicial process, Mason would see their darkest predictions verified.

Anti-Federalist Stance: High Bill of Rights Scrutiny
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

⚖️ Discretionary Twilight Zone
40 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Moderate Friction

Administers commerce or fiscal programs requiring ongoing statutory delegation and legislative oversight.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Moderate Friction

Directs internal executive branch machinery, agency workflows, and federal personnel.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

Moderate Friction

Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Moderate Friction

Applies regulatory or compliance standards to private contractors or commercial entities.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Low Friction

The President operates strictly as the constitutional Chief Executive, carrying out policy established by Congress with strong statutory backing.

Benchmark: Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
745
4,784 characters
Estimated Read Time
4 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
16.3
Post-Graduate Legal
Language Tone Score
+0.29
Constitutional Fidelity
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

ESTABLISHING THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE REVIEW OF ANTITRUST LAWS AND PROCEDURES By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and statutes of the United States of .America, and as President of the United States of America, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 1), it is hereby ordered as follows: SECTION 1. Establishment. (a) There is hereby established the National Commission for the Review of Antitrust Laws and Procedures, hereafter referred to as the Commission. (b) The Commission shall consist of fifteen members to be appointed by the President and shall include: (1) The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. (2) The Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission. (3) The Chairman of one other appropriate independent regulatory agency. (4) Three members of the Senate recommended by the President of the Senate. (5) Three members of the House of Representatives recommended by the Speaker of the House of Representatives. (6) One judge of a United States District Court. (7) Five persons from the private sector. (c) The President shall designate a Chairman or Cochairmen from among the members of the Commission. SEC. 2. Functions of the Commission. (a) The Commission shall, within the framework of existing antitrust laws (as that term is defined in 15 U.S.C. 12), study and make recommendations on the following subjects: (1) Revision of procedural and substantive rules of law needed to expedite the resolution of complex antitrust cases and development of proposals for making the remedies available in such cases more effective, including: (i) creation of a roster of district court judges knowledgeable regarding antitrust law and large-case problems to whom such cases may be assigned; (ii) revision of pleading requirements in order to narrow as quickly and precisely as possible the scope of contested issues of fact and law; (iii) revision of discovery practices in order to limit expensive and time-consuming inquiry into areas not germane to contested issues; (iv) the desirability of a grant of judicial authority to restrict and penalize dilatory practices through control of issue formulation and imposition of sanctions for unnecessary delays or failures to cooperate; (v) amendment of evidentiary practices to expedite introduction of testimony and exhibits at trial; (vi) simplification of the standards required to establish attempted monopolization in suits brought by the United States under Section 2 of the Sherman Act; (vii) consideration of structural relief for antitrust violations, and of nonjudicial alternatives for resolution of complex antitrust issues; and (2) the desirability of retaining the various exemptions and immunities from the antitrust laws, including exemptions for regulated industries and exemptions created by State laws that inhibit competition. (b) The Commission shall conclude its work not later than six months from the date the last member is appointed and shall submit a final report to the President and the Attorney General within thirty days thereafter. The Commission shall terminate thirty days after submitting its final report. SEC. 3. Administrative Matters. (a) The Commission may request any Federal agency to furnish it with such information, advice, and services as may be useful for carrying out its functions under this Order. (b) The Department of Justice shall furnish to the Commission a staff director and any necessary staff, supplies, facilities and other administrative services. Such funds as are necessary for ordinary operations of the Commission, to the extent permitted by law, shall be provided from the appropriations available to the Department of Justice. (c) The Commission may procure, subject to the availability of funds, the temporary professional services of individuals to assist in its work, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3109 of Title 5 of the United States Code. (d) Members of the Commission shall receive no compensation from the United States by virtue of their service on the Commission but shall be entitled to receive travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law (5 U.S.C. 5702 and 5703). (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other Executive order, the functions of the President under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 1), except that of reporting annually to the Congress, which are applicable to the Commission shall be performed by the Attorney General in accordance with guidelines and procedures established by the Office of Management and Budget. JIMMY CARTER The White House, December 1, 1977. [Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 4:13 p.m., December 1, 1977]

🔗

Referenced By Later Executive Orders (2)

Subsequent presidents who cited, amended, continued, or revoked this directive in later orders.

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 12,022 (Dec. 1, 1977), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-12022-national-commission-for-the-review-antitrust-laws-and-procedures.