By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Act of Congress approved August 1, 1914, making appropriations for the sundry civil expenses of the Government for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1915, the following changes in the ports of entry in Customs Collection District No. 29 (Oregon) are hereby ordered, effective thirty days from the date of this order: The limits of the port of Astoria, Oregon, are hereby extended to include, in addition to Astoria, Warrenton, Wauna, Westport, Nakata (Driscoll Dolphins), Oregon, and Knappton, Washington. The limits of the port of Longview, Washington, are hereby extended to include, in addition to Longview, Kalama, Washington, and Rainier, Prescott, Goble, Columbia City, and St. Helens, Oregon. The limits of the port of Portland, Oregon, which is the headquarters port, are hereby extended to include, in addition to Portland, Vancouver, Washington. The limits of the port of Marshfield, Oregon, are hereby extended to include, in addition to Marshfield, North Bend, Oregon. HERBERT HOOVER The White House, September 14, 1929.
Executive Order 5193 🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority Constitutional Neutral (+0.02)
📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution
Executive Order 5193—Extending Limits of Customs Ports of Entry of Astoria, Portland, and Marshfield, Oregon, and Longview, Washington, for Incorporation in Customs Collection District No. 29
Executive Brief • At a Glance
⏱️ 1 min read (170 words) •
● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate
The following changes in the ports of entry in Customs Collection District No. 29 (Oregon) are hereby ordered, effective thirty days from the date of this order: The limits of the port of Astoria, Oregon, are hereby extended to include, in addition to Astoria, Warrenton, Wauna, Westport, Nakata (Driscoll Dolphins), Oregon, and Knappton, Washington.
⚖️ Constitutional Footing
🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority
Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises
Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis
Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.
Signed by President Herbert Hoover on September 14, 1929, this order concerns Extending Limits of Customs Ports of Entry of Astoria, Portland, and Marshfield, Oregon, and Longview, Washington, for Incorporation in Customs Collection District No. 29. The following changes in the ports of entry in Customs Collection District No. 29 (Oregon) are hereby ordered, effective thirty days from the date of this order: The limits of the port of Astoria, Oregon, are hereby extended to include, in addition to Astoria, Warrenton, Wauna, Westport, Nakata (Driscoll Dolphins), Oregon, and Knappton, Washington.
Constitutional Assessment: This action represents an orderly exercise of Article II administrative discretion, managing the internal machinery and personnel of the executive branch without abridging the ancient liberties of the people.
Key Directives & Operative Actions
▪
The following changes in the ports of entry in Customs Collection District No. 29 (Oregon) are hereby ordered, effective thirty days from the date of this order: The limits of the port of Astoria, Oregon, are hereby extended to include, in addition to Astoria, Warrenton, Wauna, Westport, Nakata (Driscoll Dolphins), Oregon, and Knappton, Washington.
▪
The limits of the port of Longview, Washington, are hereby extended to include, in addition to Longview, Kalama, Washington, and Rainier, Prescott, Goble, Columbia City, and St. Helens, Oregon.
▪
The limits of the port of Portland, Oregon, which is the headquarters port, are hereby extended to include, in addition to Portland, Vancouver, Washington.
▪
The limits of the port of Marshfield, Oregon, are hereby extended to include, in addition to Marshfield, North Bend, Oregon.
Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted
🏛️ Merchants, Importers & Commercial Enterprises
Policy Areas & Topics
🏛️
The Framers' Constitutional Council
1787 PrismEvaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.
🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority)
§
"When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate."
— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
JM
James Madison
Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy
"The constitutional magistracy was designed not to invent policy, but to be the faithful instrument of the laws passed by the people's representatives." — Speech in the First Congress (1789)
Madison would approve the structural posture of this order. The President acts strictly in subordination to statutory authority granted under Article II, Section 3 ("take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). The checks and balances hold firm because the policy origin remains with the legislature.
Madisonian Stance: Concurring (Statutory)
AH
Alexander Hamilton
The Energetic Executive & Unified Command
"The direction of war implies the direction of the common strength; and the power of directing and employing the common strength must be under the direction of the single hand of the Executive." — Federalist No. 74 (1788)
Hamilton would forcefully champion executive discretion here. For foreign entanglements, commerce defense, and national security, deliberative assemblies are too slow and faction-ridden. A unified, energetic Executive exercising swift command is precisely what the Philadelphia Convention intended for national preservation.
Hamiltonian Stance: Supportive of Execution
GM
George Mason
Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment
"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)
The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.
Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐
Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions
An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.
🛡️ High Constitutional Concordance
26 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8
Moderate Friction
Legislative Encroachment & Purse
Administers commerce or fiscal programs requiring ongoing statutory delegation and legislative oversight.
Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3
Low Friction
Executive Scope & Faithfulness
Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.
Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment
Low Friction
Federalism & State Sovereignty
Confined strictly to internal federal jurisdiction, federal property, or direct military command.
Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments
Low Friction
Due Process & Individual Rights
Focuses on internal governmental operations with no direct impairment of private rights or property.
Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers
Low Friction
Youngstown Jacksonian Tier
The President operates strictly as the constitutional Chief Executive, carrying out policy established by Congress with strong statutory backing.
Benchmark: Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
⚖️
Audit Synthesis
This order operates in close harmony with statutory authority and standard Article II supervisory execution.
Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
170
1,076 characters
Estimated Read Time
1 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
15.8
College Level
Text size:
🔗
Referenced By Later Executive Orders (1)
Subsequent presidents who cited, amended, continued, or revoked this directive in later orders.
Franklin D. Roosevelt • 1945-03-23
Related Executive Orders
Other executive actions signed by Herbert Hoover around this period.
EO 5192 Sep 14, 1929
🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5192—Abolishing Lewiston, New York, as a Customs Port of Entry
📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution
By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Act of Congress approved August 1, 1914, Lewiston, New York, is hereby abolished as a port of entry in Customs Collection District No. 9 (Buffalo) with headquarters at Buffalo, New York, effective thirty days from the date of this…
Herbert Hoover High School • 1m
EO 5191 Sep 13, 1929
⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5191—Restoring Certain Reserved Lands Withdrawn for Classification and Legislation to Permit Homestead Entry, Florida
📜 Art. II §1: Executive Discretion & Internal Operations
Executive Order No. 4262 dated July 3, 1925, withdrawing certain lands in the States of Alabama, Florida and Mississippi under the act of June 25, 1910, (36 Stat. 847) as amended by the act of August 24, 1912 (37 Stat. 497), pending classification and legislation is hereby…
Herbert Hoover High School • 1m
EO 5195 Sep 16, 1929
⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5195—Restoring Certain Reserved Lands Pending Resurvey and Opening Such Lands to Entry, Colorado
📜 Art. II §2: Commander-in-Chief Supervisory Authority
Executive Order No. 3883, dated July 27, 1923, withdrawing the public lands in T. 28 S., R. 56 W., and sections 6, 7, 18, 19, 30 and 31, T. 28 S., R. 55 W., 6th P.M., Colorado, pending a resurvey, be and the same is hereby revoked as to the lands in T. 28 S., R. 55 W., and as…
Herbert Hoover High School • 1m
EO 5194 Sep 16, 1929
🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5194—Reserving Certain Described Lands for Classification, Arkansas
📜 10th Amend: Intergovernmental Federalism Cooperation
The following described public lands in the State of Arkansas be, and they are hereby temporarily withdrawn from settlement, location, sale or entry, subject to the conditions and limitations of said acts, for classification in connection with certain areas which have been, or…
Herbert Hoover Grade 1 • 3m
EO 5190 Sep 11, 1929
⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5190—Reserving Certain Described Lands for Classification and Pending Legislation, Oregon
📜 Art. II §1: Executive Discretion & Internal Operations
The SE¼ Sec. 33, T. 2 S., R. 6 W., and Lots 3 and 4, Sec. 3, T. 3 S., R. 6 W., W.M., Oregon, be, and they are hereby temporarily withdrawn from settlement, location, sale or entry, except as provided in said acts, for classification and in aid of proposed legislation.
Herbert Hoover Grade 8 • 1m
EO 5189 Sep 11, 1929
🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority) Constitutional Neutral
Executive Order 5189—Prescribing Regulations Governing the Administration of the Foreign Service
📜 Art. I §8: Delegated Tariff & Commerce Execution
The President in the exercise of the powers conferred upon him by the Constitution and laws of the United States, makes the following regulations: 1.
Herbert Hoover Post-Graduate Legal • 9m
📜
Scholarly & Legal Citations
Exec. Order No. 5193 (Sept. 14, 1929), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-5193-extending-limits-customs-ports-entry-astoria-portland-and-marshfield.
