★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 6861 ⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight Constitutional Neutral (+0.02) 📜 1st Amend: Civil Liberties & Expressive Protections

Executive Order 6861—Staying Certain Amendments to the Code of Fair Competition for the Cotton Garment Industry Approved by Executive Order No. 6828 of August 21, 1934

•
Friday, September 28, 1934
•
2 min read (325 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 2 min read (325 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

That the National Industrial Recovery Board shall forthwith appoint a committee of three impartial persons who have not heretofore formed an opinion concerning the subject matter of said amendments, which committee shall hear said protests, investigate the facts and report its recommendations on or before October 10, 1934. 3.

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight
Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
📜 1st Amend: Civil Liberties & Expressive Protections
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Executive Branch Departments General Body of the People

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on September 28, 1934, this order concerns Staying Certain Amendments to the Code of Fair Competition for the Cotton Garment Industry Approved by Executive Order No. 6828 of August 21, 1934. That said amendments to Articles III and IV of the Code of Fair Competition for the Cotton Garment Industry be stayed up to and including October 15, 1934. 2. That the National Industrial Recovery Board shall forthwith appoint a committee of three impartial persons who have not heretofore formed an opinion concerning the subject matter of said amendments, which committee shall hear said protests, investigate the…

Constitutional Assessment: This action represents an orderly exercise of Article II administrative discretion, managing the internal machinery and personnel of the executive branch without abridging the ancient liberties of the people.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

That the National Industrial Recovery Board shall forthwith appoint a committee of three impartial persons who have not heretofore formed an opinion concerning the subject matter of said amendments, which committee shall hear said protests, investigate the facts and report its recommendations on or before October 10, 1934. 3.

▪

This order is made upon the understanding that the protestants will accept as final and will abide by such decision and order as I shall make on or before October 15, 1934, after consideration of said recommendations.

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Executive Branch Departments 🏛️ General Body of the People
🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight)
§

"When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"Power is of an encroaching nature, and it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." — Federalist No. 48 (1788)

Madison would view this order with watchful scrutiny. Operating in the 'Zone of Twilight' where Congress is silent, each such directive establishes an administrative precedent that steadily expands the executive perimeter at the expense of legislative primacy.

Madisonian Stance: Vigilant / Cautionary
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)

Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.

Hamiltonian Stance: Defends Vigor & Dispatch
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The purse and the sword ought never to be in the same hands... nor the liberties of the citizen placed at the pleasure of a single magistrate." — Virginia Ratifying Convention (1788)

George Mason and the Anti-Federalists would sound a fierce warning. They feared that Article II would inevitably evolve into an elective monarchy. When an executive order impacts private rights, property, or civil liberties without individualized judicial process, Mason would see their darkest predictions verified.

Anti-Federalist Stance: High Bill of Rights Scrutiny
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

⚖️ Discretionary Twilight Zone
35 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Low Friction

Operates within delegated statutory execution without modifying legislative appropriations or taxing powers.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Moderate Friction

Directs internal executive branch machinery, agency workflows, and federal personnel.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

Moderate Friction

Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Low Friction

Focuses on internal governmental operations with no direct impairment of private rights or property.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Moderate Friction

The order relies on inherent Article II executive discretion, civil service management, or foreign diplomacy where Congress has neither expressly approved nor prohibited action.

Benchmark: Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
325
1,987 characters
Estimated Read Time
2 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
18.6
Post-Graduate Legal
Language Tone Score
+0.02
Constitutional Neutral
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

Whereas , Executive Order No. 6828 of August 21, 1934, approved, among other amendments of the Code of Fair Competition for the Cotton Garment Industry, amendments of Articles III and IV, which amendments by their terms are not to go into effect until October 1, 1934, and; Whereas , a reorganization of the National Recovery Administration has just been effected and there are pending before the newly appointed National Industrial Recovery Board protests by the Cotton Garment Code Authority and by various members of the industry against said amendments to Articles III and IV, and it appears that said Board should have an adequate opportunity to investigate the facts and make its recommendations thereon, and; Whereas , said protestants have stated that if an impartial committee were appointed to determine the issues involved in the protest, they would abide by its conclusions; Now, Therefore , by virtue of and pursuant to the authority vested in me by Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act of June 16, 1933 (c. 90, 48 Stat. 195), and in order to effectuate the purposes of said title, I hereby order: 1. That said amendments to Articles III and IV of the Code of Fair Competition for the Cotton Garment Industry be stayed up to and including October 15, 1934. 2. That the National Industrial Recovery Board shall forthwith appoint a committee of three impartial persons who have not heretofore formed an opinion concerning the subject matter of said amendments, which committee shall hear said protests, investigate the facts and report its recommendations on or before October 10, 1934. 3. That the National Industrial Recovery Board shall immediately transmit said recommendations to me. This order is made upon the understanding that the protestants will accept as final and will abide by such decision and order as I shall make on or before October 15, 1934, after consideration of said recommendations. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT The White House, September 28, 1934.

🔗

Referenced By Later Executive Orders (1)

Subsequent presidents who cited, amended, continued, or revoked this directive in later orders.

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 6861 (Sept. 28, 1934), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-6861-staying-certain-amendments-the-code-fair-competition-for-the-cotton.