Whereas , Executive Order No. 6828 of August 21, 1934, approved, among other amendments of the Code of Fair Competition for the Cotton Garment Industry, amendments of Articles III and IV, which amendments by their terms are not to go into effect until October 1, 1934, and; Whereas , a reorganization of the National Recovery Administration has just been effected and there are pending before the newly appointed National Industrial Recovery Board protests by the Cotton Garment Code Authority and by various members of the industry against said amendments to Articles III and IV, and it appears that said Board should have an adequate opportunity to investigate the facts and make its recommendations thereon, and; Whereas , said protestants have stated that if an impartial committee were appointed to determine the issues involved in the protest, they would abide by its conclusions; Now, Therefore , by virtue of and pursuant to the authority vested in me by Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act of June 16, 1933 (c. 90, 48 Stat. 195), and in order to effectuate the purposes of said title, I hereby order: 1. That said amendments to Articles III and IV of the Code of Fair Competition for the Cotton Garment Industry be stayed up to and including October 15, 1934. 2. That the National Industrial Recovery Board shall forthwith appoint a committee of three impartial persons who have not heretofore formed an opinion concerning the subject matter of said amendments, which committee shall hear said protests, investigate the facts and report its recommendations on or before October 10, 1934. 3. That the National Industrial Recovery Board shall immediately transmit said recommendations to me. This order is made upon the understanding that the protestants will accept as final and will abide by such decision and order as I shall make on or before October 15, 1934, after consideration of said recommendations. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT The White House, September 28, 1934.
Executive Order 6861—Staying Certain Amendments to the Code of Fair Competition for the Cotton Garment Industry Approved by Executive Order No. 6828 of August 21, 1934
Executive Brief • At a Glance
That the National Industrial Recovery Board shall forthwith appoint a committee of three impartial persons who have not heretofore formed an opinion concerning the subject matter of said amendments, which committee shall hear said protests, investigate the facts and report its recommendations on or before October 10, 1934. 3.
Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis
Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.
Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on September 28, 1934, this order concerns Staying Certain Amendments to the Code of Fair Competition for the Cotton Garment Industry Approved by Executive Order No. 6828 of August 21, 1934. That said amendments to Articles III and IV of the Code of Fair Competition for the Cotton Garment Industry be stayed up to and including October 15, 1934. 2. That the National Industrial Recovery Board shall forthwith appoint a committee of three impartial persons who have not heretofore formed an opinion concerning the subject matter of said amendments, which committee shall hear said protests, investigate the…
Key Directives & Operative Actions
That the National Industrial Recovery Board shall forthwith appoint a committee of three impartial persons who have not heretofore formed an opinion concerning the subject matter of said amendments, which committee shall hear said protests, investigate the facts and report its recommendations on or before October 10, 1934. 3.
This order is made upon the understanding that the protestants will accept as final and will abide by such decision and order as I shall make on or before October 15, 1934, after consideration of said recommendations.
Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted
Policy Areas & Topics
The Framers' Constitutional Council
1787 PrismEvaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.
"When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority."
James Madison
Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy
"Power is of an encroaching nature, and it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." — Federalist No. 48 (1788)
Madison would view this order with watchful scrutiny. Operating in the 'Zone of Twilight' where Congress is silent, each such directive establishes an administrative precedent that steadily expands the executive perimeter at the expense of legislative primacy.
Alexander Hamilton
The Energetic Executive & Unified Command
"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)
Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.
George Mason
Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment
"The purse and the sword ought never to be in the same hands... nor the liberties of the citizen placed at the pleasure of a single magistrate." — Virginia Ratifying Convention (1788)
George Mason and the Anti-Federalists would sound a fierce warning. They feared that Article II would inevitably evolve into an elective monarchy. When an executive order impacts private rights, property, or civil liberties without individualized judicial process, Mason would see their darkest predictions verified.
Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions
An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.
Legislative Encroachment & Purse
Operates within delegated statutory execution without modifying legislative appropriations or taxing powers.
Executive Scope & Faithfulness
Directs internal executive branch machinery, agency workflows, and federal personnel.
Federalism & State Sovereignty
Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.
Due Process & Individual Rights
Focuses on internal governmental operations with no direct impairment of private rights or property.
Youngstown Jacksonian Tier
The order relies on inherent Article II executive discretion, civil service management, or foreign diplomacy where Congress has neither expressly approved nor prohibited action.
This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.
Referenced By Later Executive Orders (1)
Subsequent presidents who cited, amended, continued, or revoked this directive in later orders.
Scholarly & Legal Citations
Exec. Order No. 6861 (Sept. 28, 1934), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-6861-staying-certain-amendments-the-code-fair-competition-for-the-cotton.