★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 6999 ⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight Constitutional Neutral (+0.02) 📜 Art. II §1: Executive Discretion & Internal Operations

Executive Order 6999—Amendment of Executive Order No. 6182 of June 26, 1933 (As Amended by Executive Orders Nos. 6345 and 6551)

•
Saturday, March 30, 1935
•
2 min read (459 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 2 min read (459 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

Executive Order No. 6182 of June 26, 1933 (as amended by Executive Orders Nos. 6345 and 6551, dated October 20, 1933, and January 8, 1934, respectively), delegating to the Secretary of Agriculture certain of the powers vested in me by said Title, is hereby amended as follows: All the functions and powers heretofore delegated by said Executive Order No. 6182, as amended, to the Secret ary of Agriculture with respect to Codes of Fair Competition for (1) the Wheat Flour Milling Industry, (2) the Feed Manufacturing Industry, (3) the Country Grain Elevator Industry of the United States, (4) the Malt Industry, and (5) the Southern Rice Milling Industry (including all functions and powers delegated to the Secretary of Agriculture under the…

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
⚖️✨ Zone 2: Zone of Twilight
Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
📜 Art. II §1: Executive Discretion & Internal Operations
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Executive Branch Departments General Body of the People

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on March 30, 1935, this order concerns Amendment of Executive Order No. 6182 of June 26, 1933 (As Amended by Executive Orders Nos. 6345 and 6551). Executive Order No. 6182 of June 26, 1933 (as amended by Executive Orders Nos. 6345 and 6551, dated October 20, 1933, and January 8, 1934, respectively), delegating to the Secretary of Agriculture certain of the powers vested in me by said Title, is hereby amended as follows: All the functions and powers heretofore delegated by said Executive Order No. 6182, as amended, to the Secret ary of Agriculture with respect…

Constitutional Assessment: This action represents an orderly exercise of Article II administrative discretion, managing the internal machinery and personnel of the executive branch without abridging the ancient liberties of the people.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

Executive Order No. 6182 of June 26, 1933 (as amended by Executive Orders Nos. 6345 and 6551, dated October 20, 1933, and January 8, 1934, respectively), delegating to the Secretary of Agriculture certain of the powers vested in me by said Title, is hereby amended as follows: All the functions and powers heretofore delegated by said Executive Order No. 6182, as amended, to the Secret ary of Agriculture with respect to Codes of Fair Competition for (1) the Wheat Flour Milling Industry, (2) the Feed Manufacturing Industry, (3) the Country Grain Elevator Industry of the United States, (4) the Malt Industry, and (5) the Southern Rice Milling Industry (including all functions and powers delegated to the Secretary of Agriculture under the…

▪

This limitation upon the functions and powers transferred and delegated is established in order that such subject matters may be dealt with by the Secretary of Agriculture under subsections (2) and (3) of section 8 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act without conflicting with the exercise of such functions and powers by the National Industrial Recovery Board.

▪

The Secretary of Agriculture shall continue to have the authority with respect to the said Codes of Fair Competition to appoint a representative or representatives as a member or members of the Code Authority as provided by the said Codes.

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Executive Branch Departments 🏛️ General Body of the People

Policy Areas & Topics

🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

⚖️✨ Zone 2 (Zone of Twilight)
§

"When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"Power is of an encroaching nature, and it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." — Federalist No. 48 (1788)

Madison would view this order with watchful scrutiny. Operating in the 'Zone of Twilight' where Congress is silent, each such directive establishes an administrative precedent that steadily expands the executive perimeter at the expense of legislative primacy.

Madisonian Stance: Vigilant / Cautionary
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)

Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.

Hamiltonian Stance: Defends Vigor & Dispatch
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)

The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.

Anti-Federalist Stance: Eternal Vigilance Required
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

⚖️ Discretionary Twilight Zone
30 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Low Friction

Operates within delegated statutory execution without modifying legislative appropriations or taxing powers.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Low Friction

Exercises standard supervisory executive authority to faithfully execute existing statutes.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

Moderate Friction

Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Low Friction

Focuses on internal governmental operations with no direct impairment of private rights or property.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Moderate Friction

The order relies on inherent Article II executive discretion, civil service management, or foreign diplomacy where Congress has neither expressly approved nor prohibited action.

Benchmark: Concurrent Authority / Congressional Silence
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
459
2,932 characters
Estimated Read Time
2 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
16.9
Post-Graduate Legal
Language Tone Score
+0.02
Constitutional Neutral
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

By virtue of and pursuant to the authority vested in me by Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act of June 16, 1933 (ch. 90, 48 Stat. 195), Executive Order No. 6182 of June 26, 1933 (as amended by Executive Orders Nos. 6345 and 6551, dated October 20, 1933, and January 8, 1934, respectively), delegating to the Secretary of Agriculture certain of the powers vested in me by said Title, is hereby amended as follows: All the functions and powers heretofore delegated by said Executive Order No. 6182, as amended, to the Secret ary of Agriculture with respect to Codes of Fair Competition for (1) the Wheat Flour Milling Industry, (2) the Feed Manufacturing Industry, (3) the Country Grain Elevator Industry of the United States, (4) the Malt Industry, and (5) the Southern Rice Milling Industry (including all functions and powers delegated to the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the said Codes of Fair Competition and of the Executive Orders approving said Codes of Fair Competition), are hereby transferred and delegated to the National Industrial Recovery Board except as follows: I. The functions and powers transferred and delegated with respect to said Codes of Fair Competition shall not, without the written approval of the Secretary of Agriculture, be exercised through the fixation or control of: (1) Prices in connection with the purchase of agricultural commodities from producers and the subsequent sale or disposition by first processors of the first processed articles. (2) Brokerage fees involved in the purchase of agricultural commodities from producers and the subsequent sale or disposition by first processors of the first processed articles. (3) Credits and financial charges with reference to agricultural products. (4) Commission rates in connection with the purchase of agricultural commodities from the producers and the subsequent sale or disposition by first processors of the first processed articles. (5) Purchasing arrangements with regard to agricultural commodities in their original form. (6) Marketing quotas in connection with the purchase of agricultural commodities from producers and the subsequent sale or disposition by first processors of the first processed articles. (7) Plant capacity or its allocation. This limitation upon the functions and powers transferred and delegated is established in order that such subject matters may be dealt with by the Secretary of Agriculture under subsections (2) and (3) of section 8 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act without conflicting with the exercise of such functions and powers by the National Industrial Recovery Board. II. The Secretary of Agriculture shall continue to have the authority with respect to the said Codes of Fair Competition to appoint a representative or representatives as a member or members of the Code Authority as provided by the said Codes. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT The White House, March 30, 1935.

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 6999 (Mar. 30, 1935), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-6999-amendment-executive-order-no-6182-june-26-1933-amended-executive.