★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 8333 ⚖️⚠️ Zone 3: Lowest Ebb Constitutional Friction / Overreach (-0.19) 📜 Art. II §2: Commander-in-Chief / War Prerogative Tension

Executive Order 8333—Amending Executive Order No. 5952 of November 23, 1932, Prescribing the Army Ration

•
Thursday, January 25, 1940
•
2 min read (492 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 2 min read (492 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

Executive Order No. 5952 of November 23, 1932, prescribing the Army Ration, is hereby amended as follows: 1.

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
⚖️⚠️ Zone 3: Lowest Ebb
Incompatible with Expressed Will of Congress or High Friction
📜 Art. II §2: Commander-in-Chief / War Prerogative Tension
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Armed Forces & Military Establishments

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on January 25, 1940, this order concerns Amending Executive Order No. 5952 of November 23, 1932, Prescribing the Army Ration. Executive Order No. 5952 of November 23, 1932, prescribing the Army Ration, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Subdivision (e) of Note 5 of Part 1 (Garrison Ration) is amended by adding thereto the following sentence: "This additional 10 per cent is not applicable to any additional allowance which may be authorized under Note 6, below." 2. Part 3 (Reserve Ration) is revoked in full. 3.

Constitutional Assessment: Scrutinized through Article II, Section 2, this action exercises the President's constitutional role as Commander in Chief. Early Framers recognized broad executive discretion in commanding military forces during conflict, provided it remains bounded by congressional declarations and respects civilian domestic courts.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

Executive Order No. 5952 of November 23, 1932, prescribing the Army Ration, is hereby amended as follows: 1.

▪

Subdivision (e) of Note 5 of Part 1 (Garrison Ration) is amended by adding thereto the following sentence: "This additional 10 per cent is not applicable to any additional allowance which may be authorized under Note 6, below." 2.

▪

Part 3 (Reserve Ration) is revoked in full. 3.

▪

Part 4 (Field Ration) is amended to read as follows: "The Field Ration is that prescribed for use only in time of war or national emergency when the garrison ration is not used.

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Armed Forces & Military Establishments
🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

⚖️⚠️ Zone 3 (Lowest Ebb)
§

"When the President takes measures incompatible with the expressed or implied will of Congress, his power is at its lowest ebb."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Incompatible with Expressed Will of Congress or High Friction
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands... may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." — Federalist No. 47 (1788)

Madison would express grave alarm over this order. By asserting independent authority in tension with legislative limits or the Bill of Rights, the Executive risks collapsing the separation of powers into unilateral rule. Under the Madisonian model, no emergency justifies the Executive substituting its decree for a deliberative Act of Congress.

Madisonian Stance: Strict Dissent (Overreach)
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"The direction of war implies the direction of the common strength; and the power of directing and employing the common strength must be under the direction of the single hand of the Executive." — Federalist No. 74 (1788)

Hamilton would forcefully champion executive discretion here. For foreign entanglements, commerce defense, and national security, deliberative assemblies are too slow and faction-ridden. A unified, energetic Executive exercising swift command is precisely what the Philadelphia Convention intended for national preservation.

Hamiltonian Stance: Strong Prerogative Support
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The purse and the sword ought never to be in the same hands... nor the liberties of the citizen placed at the pleasure of a single magistrate." — Virginia Ratifying Convention (1788)

George Mason and the Anti-Federalists would sound a fierce warning. They feared that Article II would inevitably evolve into an elective monarchy. When an executive order impacts private rights, property, or civil liberties without individualized judicial process, Mason would see their darkest predictions verified.

Anti-Federalist Stance: Vehement Objection
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

⚠️ Elevated Constitutional Friction
63 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Low Friction

Operates within delegated statutory execution without modifying legislative appropriations or taxing powers.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

High Friction

Invokes broad unilateral or emergency executive authorities that test the constitutional boundary of the Take Care Clause.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

High Friction

Creates friction with the Tenth Amendment by conditioning state grants, mandating local compliance, or preempting state police powers.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Moderate Friction

Applies regulatory or compliance standards to private contractors or commercial entities.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

High Friction

The order asserts independent Article II prerogative against statutory constraints, reallocates funds without explicit appropriation, or stretches executive power into realms constitutionally reserved to the legislature or judiciary.

Benchmark: Incompatible with Expressed Will of Congress or High Friction
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This directive engages significant constitutional friction across statutory authorization, legislative prerogatives, or individual liberties.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
492
2,881 characters
Estimated Read Time
2 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
10.7
High School
Language Tone Score
-0.19
Constitutional Friction / Overreach
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 40 of the act of February 2, 1901, entitled "An Act to increase the efficiency of the permanent military establishment of the United States" (31 Stat. 748, 758), Executive Order No. 5952 of November 23, 1932, prescribing the Army Ration, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Subdivision (e) of Note 5 of Part 1 (Garrison Ration) is amended by adding thereto the following sentence: "This additional 10 per cent is not applicable to any additional allowance which may be authorized under Note 6, below." 2. Part 3 (Reserve Ration) is revoked in full. 3. Part 4 (Field Ration) is amended to read as follows: "The Field Ration is that prescribed for use only in time of war or national emergency when the garrison ration is not used. It will be issued in kind, and no ration savings will be allowed. Its components and substitutes will be prescribed by the Secretary of War or the commander of the field forces, and will consist of the following: (a) Field Ration "A." This ration will correspond as nearly as practicable with the components or substitutes therefor of the garrison ration. This type of field ration will be issued as often as circumstances permit. (b) Field Ration "B." This ration will correspond as nearly as practicable with the components of Field Ration "A" with the exception that non-perishable processed or canned products will replace items of a perishable nature. (c) Field Ration "C." This ration will consist of previously cooked or prepared food, packed in hermetically sealed cans, which food may be eaten either hot or cold, and will consist of six cans per ration as follows: 3 cans containing a meat and a vegetable component. 3 cans containing crackers, sugar, and soluble coffee. (d) Field Ration "D." This ration will consist of three 4-ounce bars of concentrated chocolate. (e) In time of war Field Rations "C" and "D" are to be issued only upon orders of the commander of the field forces. In time of peace, such of these types as are available may, for training purposes, be utilized when directed by proper authority. (f) When deemed advisable, a combination of Field Rations "C" and "D" may constitute the Field Ration. This will normally consist of two cans of the meat and vegetable component, two cans of the crackers, sugar, and soluble coffee, and two 4-ounce bars of concentrated chocolate." (g) In the theater of operations, when they cannot be obtained otherwise by the troops, the commander of the field forces may authorize the issue of any of the following items as a part of the field ration, not to exceed the allowances per ration as shown. 4. Parts 4 (Field Ration), 5 (Troops Traveling on Transports), and 6 (Ration and Savings Accounts) are re-numbered 3, 4, and 5, respectively. This order shall be effective immediately. FRANKLIN D ROOSEVELT The White House, January 25, 1940.

🔗

Referenced By Later Executive Orders (1)

Subsequent presidents who cited, amended, continued, or revoked this directive in later orders.

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 8333 (Jan. 25, 1940), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-8333-amending-executive-order-no-5952-november-23-1932-prescribing-the.