By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 9 of the Classification Act of 1923 (42 Stat. 1490), as amended by Title V of the Act of June 30, 1932 (47 Stat. 416), by section 7, Title II of the Act of November 26, 1940 (54 Stat. 1215), and by section 3 of the Act of August 1, 1941 (55 Stat. 614), I hereby approve the following regulations prescribed by the Civil Service Commission: REGULATIONS RELATING TO EFFICIENCY RATING BOARDS OF REVIEW Pursuant to the authority vested in the Civil Service Commission by section 9 of the Classification Act of 1923 (42 Stat. 1490), as amended by Title V of the Act of June 30, 1932 (47 Stat. 41Q), by section 7, Title II of the Act of November 26, 1940 (54 Stat. 1215), and by section 3 of the Act of August 1, 1941 (55 Stat. 614), the following regulations are hereby prescribed with respect to efficiency rating boards of review: 1. There shall be established in each department and independent establishment having positions and employees subject to section 9 of the Classification Act of 1923, as amended, one or more boards of review for the purpose of considering and passing upon the merits of efficiency ratings assigned to such employees. 2. The head of each department or independent establishment shall determine the number and jurisdiction of boards of review to be established within his department or establishment, subject to the approval of the Civil Service Commission. The jurisdiction of each board of review shall be specific and shall be exclusive of that of any other such board. 3. (a) Each board of review shall be composed of three members, and there shall be an alternate member provided for each principal member who shall serve during the absence of such principal member or when the principal member is unable to serve for any other reason and who shall succeed the principal member in the event that he is unable to serve to the end of his term of office. Where necessary in the interest of good administration, and in order to expedite the consideration of cases, an additional alternate member may be designated for each principal member. Members of boards of review and alternate members shall be appointed or designated for terms expiring June 30 subsequent to their appointment or designation, provided that they may continue to serve until their successors are appointed or designated. (a) One member of each board of review and alternates to such member (to be known as department member and alternate department members) shall be designated by the head of the department or establishment served by such board. (c) Another member of each board of review and alternates to such member (to be known as employee member and alternate employee members) shall be designated by election, to be held between April 1 and July 1 of each calendar year for the term beginning on July 1 of such year, by the employees whose efficiency ratings are under the jurisdiction of the board in such manner as shall be determined by the Civil Service Commission. Upon the request of the head of a department or establishment or of ten per cent of the employees whose efficiency ratings are subject to review by a board of review, the Civil Service Commission may order an election for employee members and alternate employee members at a different time or may authorize the definite or indefinite postponement of the regular annual election. (d) Chairmen and alternate chairmen for the boards of review shall be designated by the Civil Service Commission. (e) All members of boards of review and all alternate members shall be officers or employees of the executive branch of the Federal government; provided, however, that in the case of boards of review serving agencies not in the executive branch, such members and alternate members (except chairmen and alternate chairmen) shall be appointed or elected from the branch of government to which such agencies respectively belong. 4. Each appeal from an efficiency rating shall be submitted in writing to the chairman of the appropriate board of review within ninety days of the date that notice of such rating was delivered to the employee. Boards of review may waive this requirement for good and sufficient reasons, as in cases (a) where it appears that appellants were not in a position to make an appeal within the ninety-day period, (b) where employees elected to avail themselves of the grievance procedures in their own departments or establishments before proceeding with appeals under these regulations, or (c) where new evidence is discovered after the close of the ninety-day period which would have a bearing on the decision concerning the appeal. On the request of the Civil Service Commission, certified in writing, efficiency ratings which require the dismissal, demotion, or reduction in salary of employees subject to the approval of the Civil Service Commission under section 9 of the Classification Act of 1923 as amended shall be considered by boards of review in the same manner as if appealed by such employees. 5. Hearings conducted on efficiency rating appeals and certified cases shall be on as informal a basis as possible and yet permit the presentation of all information necessary to ascertain the correctness of the rating in question or the rating which should be assigned the employee. An oral hearing may be waived by the appellant, or employee whose rating is certified for review, and the board of review may thereupon proceed to a consideration of the case on the basis of written evidence submitted by the parties. Stenographic reports of oral hearings shall be required only when it is determined by the unanimous vote of the board that they are necessary to the best interests of the Government and employee. In all proceedings before boards of review, each employee whose efficiency rating is under consideration shall be entitled to have a representative of his own selection: and at oral hearings each appellant or employee whose rating is certified for review shall be entitled to appear with his representative. The appellant, or employee whose rating is certified for review, and his representative, and such representatives of the department or establishment as are designated by the head thereof, shall be afforded an opportunity to submit orally or in writing any information deemed by the board of review to be pertinent to the case, and shall be afforded an opportunity to hear or examine, and to reply to, information submitted to such board by other parties. 6. After ascertaining the pertinent facts in each case, the board of review shall proceed to determine such adjustment in the efficiency rating as it deems proper, or sustain the efficiency rating appealed from without change. Decisions shall be made by a majority vote. Notices of decisions of boards of review shall be communicated to the heads of the departments or independent establishments and to the appellants, and employees whose ratings are certified for review, in writing and shall contain summary statements of the facts on which the decisions are based. Copies of the decisions of the boards shall also be forwarded to the Civil Service Commission. 7. These regulations apply with full force and effect to the administration of efficiency-rating boards of review in the departmental service. Until such time as the Civil Service Commission, after consultation with heads of departments and independent establishments, decides that it is practicable to extend the foregoing provisions in their full force and effect to the field services, efficiency-rating appeals from employees in the field services may be made to boards of review established in and for the departmental headquarters of said field services for adjudication on the basis of evidence submitted in writing. 8. These regulations supersede the regulations in Executive Order No. 8748 of May 1, 1941, and in Executive Order No. 9155 of May 1, 1942, and shall be effective immediately, except that the provision in Section 3 above authorizing members of boards of review to serve until their successors are appointed or designated shall be effective retroactively to July 1, 1941. FRANKLIN D ROOSEVELT H. B. Mitchell, Lucille Foster McMillin Arthur S. Fleming, Commissioners. The White House, October 9, 1942.
Executive Order 9252—Approving Regulations of the Civil Service Commission Relating to Efficiency-Rating Boards of Review
Executive Brief • At a Glance
I hereby approve the following regulations prescribed by the Civil Service Commission: REGULATIONS RELATING TO EFFICIENCY RATING BOARDS OF REVIEW Pursuant to the authority vested in the Civil Service Commission by section 9 of the Classification Act of 1923 (42 Stat. 1490), as amended by Title V of the Act of June 30, 1932 (47 Stat. 41Q), by section 7, Title II of the Act of November 26, 1940 (54 Stat. 1215), and by section 3 of the Act of August 1, 1941 (55 Stat. 614), the following regulations are hereby prescribed with respect to efficiency rating boards of review: 1.
Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis
Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.
Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on October 9, 1942, this order concerns Approving Regulations of the Civil Service Commission Relating to Efficiency-Rating Boards of Review. I hereby approve the following regulations prescribed by the Civil Service Commission: REGULATIONS RELATING TO EFFICIENCY RATING BOARDS OF REVIEW Pursuant to the authority vested in the Civil Service Commission by section 9 of the Classification Act of 1923 (42 Stat. 1490), as amended by Title V of the Act of June 30, 1932 (47 Stat. 41Q), by section 7, Title II of the Act of November 26, 1940 (54 Stat. 1215), and…
Key Directives & Operative Actions
I hereby approve the following regulations prescribed by the Civil Service Commission: REGULATIONS RELATING TO EFFICIENCY RATING BOARDS OF REVIEW Pursuant to the authority vested in the Civil Service Commission by section 9 of the Classification Act of 1923 (42 Stat. 1490), as amended by Title V of the Act of June 30, 1932 (47 Stat. 41Q), by section 7, Title II of the Act of November 26, 1940 (54 Stat. 1215), and by section 3 of the Act of August 1, 1941 (55 Stat. 614), the following regulations are hereby prescribed with respect to efficiency rating boards of review: 1.
There shall be established in each department and independent establishment having positions and employees subject to section 9 of the Classification Act of 1923, as amended, one or more boards of review for the purpose of considering and passing upon the merits of efficiency ratings assigned to such employees. 2.
The head of each department or independent establishment shall determine the number and jurisdiction of boards of review to be established within his department or establishment, subject to the approval of the Civil Service Commission.
The jurisdiction of each board of review shall be specific and shall be exclusive of that of any other such board. 3.
Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted
Policy Areas & Topics
The Framers' Constitutional Council
1787 PrismEvaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.
"When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority."
James Madison
Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy
"Power is of an encroaching nature, and it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." — Federalist No. 48 (1788)
Madison would view this order with watchful scrutiny. Operating in the 'Zone of Twilight' where Congress is silent, each such directive establishes an administrative precedent that steadily expands the executive perimeter at the expense of legislative primacy.
Alexander Hamilton
The Energetic Executive & Unified Command
"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)
Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.
George Mason
Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment
"The president will be surrounded by flatterers and sycophants... and the great powers of the executive will gradually absorb the liberties of the people." — Cato IV (Anti-Federalist, 1787)
The Anti-Federalist prism advises continuous democratic vigilance. Even routine administrative directives aggregate centralized federal power away from town halls and state assemblies toward a distant executive apparatus.
Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions
An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.
Legislative Encroachment & Purse
Operates within delegated statutory execution without modifying legislative appropriations or taxing powers.
Executive Scope & Faithfulness
Directs internal executive branch machinery, agency workflows, and federal personnel.
Federalism & State Sovereignty
Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.
Due Process & Individual Rights
Applies regulatory or compliance standards to private contractors or commercial entities.
Youngstown Jacksonian Tier
The order relies on inherent Article II executive discretion, civil service management, or foreign diplomacy where Congress has neither expressly approved nor prohibited action.
This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.
Scholarly & Legal Citations
Exec. Order No. 9252 (Oct. 9, 1942), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-9252-approving-regulations-the-civil-service-commission-relating.