★
Executive Orders Historical Archive
Cite
Executive Order 11992 🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority Constitutional Fidelity (+0.44) 📜 5th Amend: Regulatory Execution with Due Process

Executive Order 11992—Committee on Selection of Federal Judicial Officers

•
Tuesday, May 24, 1977
•
3 min read (676 words)

Executive Brief • At a Glance

⏱️ 3 min read (676 words) • ● In Effect
🎯 Primary Mandate

There is hereby established the Committee on Selection of Federal Judicial Officers, hereinafter referred to as the Committee.

⚖️ Constitutional Footing
🏛️✅ Zone 1: Maximum Authority
Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
📜 5th Amend: Regulatory Execution with Due Process
🏛️ Scope & Affected Sectors
Sovereign State Governments & Localities Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants

Plain-English Translation & Framers' Constitutional Analysis

Early Statesman synthesis distilling legal jargon into practical meaning, statutory anchors, and structural constitutional impacts.

Signed by President Jimmy Carter on May 24, 1977, this order concerns Committee on Selection of Federal Judicial Officers. Establishment of the Committee. There is hereby established the Committee on Selection of Federal Judicial Officers, hereinafter referred to as the Committee. The Committee shall consist of a Chairman and six other members to be appointed by the President. SEC. 2. Functions.

Constitutional Assessment: Evaluated against the Fifth Amendment, this action touches upon property or economic rights. An early statesman would insist upon strict adherence to due process of law and the constitutional guarantee that private holdings shall not be encumbered or taken for public purposes without just compensation and lawful process.

Key Directives & Operative Actions

▪

There is hereby established the Committee on Selection of Federal Judicial Officers, hereinafter referred to as the Committee.

▪

The Committee shall consist of a Chairman and six other members to be appointed by the President.

▪

When requested by the President, the Committee shall conduct inquiries to identify persons who may be qualified to serve as Federal judicial officers, other than United States Circuit Judges or District Judges, and shall conduct investigations of those persons to determine their qualifications.

▪

When notified by the President that he desires its assistance in filling a Federal judicial vacancy, other than a United States Circuit Court or District Court vacancy, the Committee shall conduct inquiries to identify persons who may be qualified to serve in the position and shall conduct further inquiries to determine those persons' qualifications.

Constitutional & Societal Entities Impacted

🏛️ Sovereign State Governments & Localities 🏛️ Executive Departments & Federal Civil Servants

Policy Areas & Topics

🏛️

The Framers' Constitutional Council

1787 Prism

Evaluating this order against the constitutional debates of 1787 and the limits of Article II executive power.

🏛️✅ Zone 1 (Maximum Authority)
§

"When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate."

— Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
JM

James Madison

Separation of Powers & Legislative Primacy

"The constitutional magistracy was designed not to invent policy, but to be the faithful instrument of the laws passed by the people's representatives." — Speech in the First Congress (1789)

Madison would approve the structural posture of this order. The President acts strictly in subordination to statutory authority granted under Article II, Section 3 ("take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). The checks and balances hold firm because the policy origin remains with the legislature.

Madisonian Stance: Concurring (Statutory)
AH

Alexander Hamilton

The Energetic Executive & Unified Command

"A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government." — Federalist No. 70 (1788)

Hamilton would view this directive as the natural and indispensable functioning of administrative leadership. Without the power to coordinate agencies, manage personnel, and resolve operational ambiguities, the modern presidency would be reduced to an impotent figurehead.

Hamiltonian Stance: Supportive of Execution
GM

George Mason

Bill of Rights, Due Process & 10th Amendment

"The purse and the sword ought never to be in the same hands... nor the liberties of the citizen placed at the pleasure of a single magistrate." — Virginia Ratifying Convention (1788)

George Mason and the Anti-Federalists would sound a fierce warning. They feared that Article II would inevitably evolve into an elective monarchy. When an executive order impacts private rights, property, or civil liberties without individualized judicial process, Mason would see their darkest predictions verified.

Anti-Federalist Stance: High Bill of Rights Scrutiny
📐

Five Measurable "Constitutional Friction" Dimensions

An objective audit measuring potential separation-of-powers tension against the United States Constitution and established Supreme Court doctrine.

⚖️ Discretionary Twilight Zone
40 / 100 friction index
Dimension 1 • Art. I, §1 & §8

Legislative Encroachment & Purse

Moderate Friction

Administers commerce or fiscal programs requiring ongoing statutory delegation and legislative oversight.

Benchmark: Power of the purse, taxes/tariffs, and rule of law reserved to Congress.
Dimension 2 • Art. II, §1 & §3

Executive Scope & Faithfulness

Moderate Friction

Directs internal executive branch machinery, agency workflows, and federal personnel.

Benchmark: Faithfully execute laws enacted by Congress vs. unilateral decree.
Dimension 3 • 10th Amendment

Federalism & State Sovereignty

Moderate Friction

Engages state and local partners in cooperative federalism programs.

Benchmark: Police powers and un-delegated responsibilities reserved to the States.
Dimension 4 • 5th & 14th Amendments

Due Process & Individual Rights

Moderate Friction

Applies regulatory or compliance standards to private contractors or commercial entities.

Benchmark: Protection of private property, contracts, liberty, and procedural justice.
Dimension 5 • Separation of Powers

Youngstown Jacksonian Tier

Low Friction

The President operates strictly as the constitutional Chief Executive, carrying out policy established by Congress with strong statutory backing.

Benchmark: Express or Implied Congressional Authorization
⚖️ Audit Synthesis

This order operates within Justice Jackson’s Zone of Twilight, resting upon concurrent presidential authority or congressional silence.

Weighted composite: Art. I (25%), Art. II (25%), Federalism (15%), Due Process (15%), Youngstown (20%).
ℹ️
How to read these dimensions: Executive power expands whenever an administration acts without explicit statutory authorization from Congress (Article I), touches upon police powers historically reserved to the states (Tenth Amendment), or limits private rights and property without judicial process. A low friction score indicates strict concordance with enacted law; a high friction score highlights orders testing the limits of presidential discretion.
Total Words
676
4,312 characters
Estimated Read Time
3 min
@ 200 words / min
Flesch-Kincaid
13.8
College Level
Language Tone Score
+0.44
Constitutional Fidelity
How is this scored?
Text size:

Official Archival Text

View Source Document

ESTABLISHING THE COMMITTEE ON SELECTION OF FEDERAL JUDICIAL OFFICERS By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and statutes of the United States of America, and as President of the United States of America, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), it is hereby ordered as follows: SECTION 1. Establishment of the Committee. There is hereby established the Committee on Selection of Federal Judicial Officers, hereinafter referred to as the Committee. The Committee shall consist of a Chairman and six other members to be appointed by the President. SEC. 2. Functions. When requested by the President, the Committee shall conduct inquiries to identify persons who may be qualified to serve as Federal judicial officers, other than United States Circuit Judges or District Judges, and shall conduct investigations of those persons to determine their qualifications. SEC. 3. Procedures; Report. (a) When notified by the President that he desires its assistance in filling a Federal judicial vacancy, other than a United States Circuit Court or District Court vacancy, the Committee shall conduct inquiries to identify persons who may be qualified to serve in the position and shall conduct further inquiries to determine those persons' qualifications. (b) In conducting its inquiries the Committee shall follow any procedures established by the President in his letter of notification or by the Attorney General acting on behalf of the President. (c) The Committee shall submit to the President and to the Attorney General, within 60 days from the date it is notified by the President that he desires its assistance, a report listing the names of no more than five persons whom the Committee considers well qualified to serve in the position. In determining which persons are well qualified the Committee shall apply criteria established by the President or by the Attorney General acting on behalf of the President. (d) The Committee shall conduct such additional inquiries and submit such additional reports as may be requested by the President. (e) The Committee shall perform no function except when requested by the President to assist him in filling a vacancy. SEC. 4. Ineligibility of Committee Members. No member of the Committee shall be eligible to be nominated to fill a position as a Federal judicial officer with respect to which the Committee's assistance has been requested. SEC. 5. Cooperation by Executive Agencies. The Committee is authorized to request, through its Chairman, from any Executive department or agency such information or assistance as the Committee deems necessary to carry out its functions under this Order. Each department or agency shall, to the extent permitted by law, furnish such information or assistance to the Committee. The Committee also is authorized to request from any State agency such information and assistance as the Committee deems necessary, and to obtain such information and assistance to the extent permitted by State law. SEC. 6. Travel Expenses; Administrative Support; Financing. (a) Members of the Committee shall serve without compensation. While engaged in the work of the Committee, members may receive travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law (5 U.S.C. 5702 and 5703). (b) The Attorney General shall furnish to the Committee necessary staff, supplies, facilities and other administrative services. (c) All necessary expenses incurred in connection with the work of the Committee, to the extent permitted by law, shall be paid from funds available to the Attorney General. SEC. 7. Federal Advisory Committee Act Functions. Notwithstanding the provisions of any other Executive order, the functions of the President under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), except that of reporting annually to the Congress, which are applicable to the Committee, shall be performed by the Attorney General in accordance with the guidelines and procedures established by the Office of Management and Budget. SEC. 8. Termination of the Committee. The Committee shall terminate on. December 31, 1978, unless sooner extended. JIMMY CARTER The White House, May 24, 1977. [Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 12:02 p.m., May 25, 1977]

🔗

Referenced By Later Executive Orders (3)

Subsequent presidents who cited, amended, continued, or revoked this directive in later orders.

📜

Scholarly & Legal Citations

Exec. Order No. 11,992 (May 24, 1977), https://executiveordersarchive.org/orders/app-executive-order-11992-committee-selection-federal-judicial-officers.